141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24469217)
1. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Tessler O; Reish RG; Maman DY; Smith BL; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):90e-99e. PubMed ID: 24469217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Loustau HD; Mayer HF
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(2):323e-324e. PubMed ID: 25068354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.
Haynes DF; Kreithen JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Nov; 134(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 25347625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study.
Ganz OM; Tobalem M; Perneger T; Lam T; Modarressi A; Elias B; Pittet B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Mar; 135(3):498e-507e. PubMed ID: 25719714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm).
Salzberg CA; Ashikari AY; Koch RM; Chabner-Thompson E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):514-524. PubMed ID: 21285756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
Colwell AS; Damjanovic B; Zahedi B; Medford-Davis L; Hertl C; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 22094736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations.
Mowlds DS; Salibian AA; Scholz T; Paydar KZ; Wirth GA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):629-635. PubMed ID: 26090760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Stitch Vicryl Mesh Wrap for Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Mookerjee VG; Stögner VA; Alper DP; Evans BGA; Pomahac B
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Jun; 11(6):e5058. PubMed ID: 37313479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.
Becker H; Lind JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 23860816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction - a long-term resorbable mesh.
Cuffolo G; Holford NC; Contractor K; Tenovici A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):689-691. PubMed ID: 30139282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Reconstructive, Revision, and Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
Becker H; Lind Ii JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Aug; 44(4):1120-1127. PubMed ID: 32844265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TIGR
Hallberg H; Lewin R; Elander A; Hansson E
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Aug; 52(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 29874964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Williamson PR; Whisker L; Thrush S; Skillman J; Barnes NLP; Mylvaganam S; Teasdale E; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):254-266. PubMed ID: 30639093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without the Use of an Acellular Dermal Matrix Is Cost Effective and Oncologically Safe.
Serrurier LCJ; Rayne S; Venter M; Benn CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Apr; 139(4):809-817. PubMed ID: 28350650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical Evaluation of Risk Factors and Early Complications in 564 Consecutive Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions Using Acellular Dermal Matrix at a Single Center.
Selber JC; Wren JH; Garvey PB; Zhang H; Erickson C; Clemens MW; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 26111310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct-to-implant single-stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: predictors of failure.
Gdalevitch P; Ho A; Genoway K; Alvrtsyan H; Bovill E; Lennox P; Van Laeken N; Macadam S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jun; 133(6):738e-747e. PubMed ID: 24867734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
