These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24470842)

  • 41. Neonatal circumcision: a dispassionate analysis.
    Learman LA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 42(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 10572698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The circumcision question.
    Robson WL; Leung AK
    Postgrad Med; 1992 May; 91(6):237-42, 244. PubMed ID: 1579530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Cultural bias in the AAP's 2012 Technical Report and Policy Statement on male circumcision.
    Frisch M; Aigrain Y; Barauskas V; Bjarnason R; Boddy SA; Czauderna P; de Gier RP; de Jong TP; Fasching G; Fetter W; Gahr M; Graugaard C; Greisen G; Gunnarsdottir A; Hartmann W; Havranek P; Hitchcock R; Huddart S; Janson S; Jaszczak P; Kupferschmid C; Lahdes-Vasama T; Lindahl H; MacDonald N; Markestad T; Märtson M; Nordhov SM; Pälve H; Petersons A; Quinn F; Qvist N; Rosmundsson T; Saxen H; Söder O; Stehr M; von Loewenich VC; Wallander J; Wijnen R
    Pediatrics; 2013 Apr; 131(4):796-800. PubMed ID: 23509170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gomco vs. plastibell office circumcision: No difference in overall post-procedural complications and healthcare utilization.
    Nicassio L; Ching CB; Klamer B; Sebastião YV; Fuchs M; McLeod DJ; Alpert S; Jayanthi R; DaJusta D
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):85.e1-85.e7. PubMed ID: 33281046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision.
    Christakis DA; Harvey E; Zerr DM; Feudtner C; Wright JA; Connell FA
    Pediatrics; 2000 Jan; 105(1 Pt 3):246-9. PubMed ID: 10617731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Response to Vogelstein: How the 2012 AAP Task Force on circumcision went wrong.
    Van Howe RS
    Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 28691236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision.
    Binner SL; Mastrobattista JM; Day MC; Swaim LS; Monga M
    South Med J; 2002 Apr; 95(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 11958247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis.
    Steadman B; Ellsworth P
    Urol Nurs; 2006 Jun; 26(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 16800325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Circumcision policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Circumcision.
    Pediatrics; 1999 Mar; 103(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 10049981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of epidemiology, safety, and complications of male circumcision using conventional dissection surgery: experience at one center.
    Moslemi MK; Abedinzadeh M; Aghaali M
    Open Access J Urol; 2011; 3():83-7. PubMed ID: 24198639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prepuce health and childhood circumcision: Choices in Canada.
    Abara EO
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2017; 11(1-2Suppl1):S55-S62. PubMed ID: 28265321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A prospective randomised comparison of bipolar diathermy versus conventional dorsal slit technique for ritual circumcision: a Malaysian experience.
    Fariz MM; Tarmizi MN; Ainaini MH; Khairil AM; Faizal A; Sagap I
    Clin Ter; 2011; 162(6):543-5. PubMed ID: 22262325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Circumcision: pros and cons.
    Burgu B; Aydogdu O; Tangal S; Soygur T
    Indian J Urol; 2010; 26(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 20535279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dorsal penile nerve block during newborn circumcision: underutilization of a proven technique?
    Toffler WL; Sinclair AE; White KA
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1990; 3(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 2378256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy.
    Morris BJ; Krieger JN; Klausner JD
    World J Clin Pediatr; 2016 Aug; 5(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 27610340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Circumcision benefits outweigh risks, but parents should choose according to revised AAP policy.
    McBride DL
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2013 Jan; 28(1):89-91. PubMed ID: 23153513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is hyperbilirubinemia a contraindication for neonatal circumcision? A survey of practice patterns of pediatric urologists and a review of the literature.
    Huen KH; Fong C; Roach G; Singer J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):88.e1-88.e6. PubMed ID: 33268314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Phimosis: dorsal slit or circumcision?].
    Corona C; Cañizo A; Cerda J; Fanjul M; Carrera N; Tardáguila A; Zornoza M; Parente A; Angulo JM; De Tomás E; Molina E; Peláez D; García Casillas MA; Rivas S; Romero R; Marín MC
    Cir Pediatr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 23155652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation.
    Alanis MC; Lucidi RS
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2004 May; 59(5):379-95. PubMed ID: 15097799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Circumcision care.
    Brown-Trask B; Van Sell S; Carter S; Kindred C
    RN; 2009 Feb; 72(2):22-8; quiz 29. PubMed ID: 19283940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.