These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24471038)
1. 3-Dimensional analysis for class III malocclusion patients with facial asymmetry. Kim EJ; Ki EJ; Cheon HM; Choi EJ; Kwon KH J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 24471038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of the three-dimensional skeletal variables with self-recognition of facial asymmetry in skeletal Class III patients. Lim SW; Jeon JB; Moon RJ; Oh S; Park A; Oh MH; Kim MS; Hwang HS; Cho JH Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(4):512-520. PubMed ID: 35166777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity. Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis and Surgical Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation. Kwon SM; Baik HS; Jung HD; Jang W; Choi YJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 77(6):1261-1275. PubMed ID: 30794815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities. Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation. Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Maxillofacial 3-dimensional morphological analysis for patients with Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry]. Pan S; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Han M Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Feb; 19(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 20300684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study. Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative outcomes of two- and three-dimensional planning in orthognathic surgery: A comparative study. Wu TY; Lin HH; Lo LJ; Ho CT J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1101-1111. PubMed ID: 28528114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Leung MY; Leung YY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29636307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A three-dimensional analysis of skeletal and dental characteristics in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry. Yu J; Hu Y; Huang M; Chen J; Ding X; Zheng L J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29562577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics? Okşayan R; Aktan AM; Sökücü O; Haştar E; Ciftci ME ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():219708. PubMed ID: 23365514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of transverse dental compensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry. Lee JY; Han SH; Ryu HS; Lee HM; Kim SC Korean J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 48(6):357-366. PubMed ID: 30450328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphologic Analysis of the Temporomandibular Joint Between Patients With Facial Asymmetry and Asymptomatic Subjects by 2D and 3D Evaluation: A Preliminary Study. Zhang YL; Song JL; Xu XC; Zheng LL; Wang QY; Fan YB; Liu Z Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(13):e3052. PubMed ID: 27043669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya. Ganeiber T; Bugaighis I J Orthod Sci; 2018; 7():14. PubMed ID: 29963509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls. van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]