BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24471367)

  • 1. Survey about pedestrian safety and attitudes toward automated traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C.
    Cicchino JB; Wells JK; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 24471367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes toward red light camera enforcement in cities with camera programs.
    McCartt AT; Eichelberger AH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22239139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of Winnipeg's photo enforcement safety program: results of time series analyses and an intersection camera experiment.
    Vanlaar W; Robertson R; Marcoux K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():238-47. PubMed ID: 24184967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety effects of law enforcement cameras at non-signalized crosswalks: A case study in China.
    Li H; Zhang Z; Sze NN; Hu H; Ding H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106124. PubMed ID: 33873136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeding drivers' attitudes and perceptions of speed cameras in rural England.
    Blincoe KM; Jones AP; Sauerzapf V; Haynes R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 16309618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of automated speed enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland, on vehicle speeds, public opinion, and crashes.
    Hu W; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():53-8. PubMed ID: 27586103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of red light camera enforcement on fatal crashes in large U.S. cities.
    Hu W; McCartt AT; Teoh ER
    J Safety Res; 2011 Aug; 42(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 22017830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacts of enforcement cameras on pedestrians' risk perception and drivers' behaviors at non-signalized crosswalks.
    Li H; Hu H; Zhang Z; Ren G; Liu X
    J Safety Res; 2022 Jun; 81():313-325. PubMed ID: 35589302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Turning off the cameras: Red light running characteristics and rates after photo enforcement legislation expired.
    Porter BE; Johnson KL; Bland JF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1104-11. PubMed ID: 23031551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing red light runners following implementation of a photo enforcement program.
    Martinez KL; Porter BE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 16581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term effects of countermeasures for improved safety and mobility at marked pedestrian crosswalks in Borås, Sweden.
    Johansson C; Leden L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 17129567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should traffic enforcement be unpredictable? The case of red light cameras in Edmonton.
    Tay R; de Barros A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):955-61. PubMed ID: 21376888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling violation of Hawaii's crosswalk law.
    Kim K; Brunner IM; Yamashita E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 May; 40(3):894-904. PubMed ID: 18460356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact evaluation of camera enforcement for traffic violations in Cali, Colombia, 2008-2014.
    Martínez-Ruíz DM; Fandiño-Losada A; Ponce de Leon A; Arango-Londoño D; Mateus JC; Jaramillo-Molina C; Bonilla-Escobar FJ; Vivas H; Vanlaar W; Gutiérrez-Martínez MI
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():267-274. PubMed ID: 30802777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a community-based pedestrian injury prevention program on driver yielding behavior at marked crosswalks.
    Sandt LS; Marshall SW; Rodriguez DA; Evenson KR; Ennett ST; Robinson WR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():169-178. PubMed ID: 27208589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing red light running through longer yellow signal timing and red light camera enforcement: results of a field investigation.
    Retting RA; Ferguson SA; Farmer CM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):327-33. PubMed ID: 18215565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drivers' behavioral responses to combined speed and red light cameras.
    Polders E; Cornu J; De Ceunynck T; Daniels S; Brijs K; Brijs T; Hermans E; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():153-66. PubMed ID: 25988809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of automated speed enforcement in Montgomery County, Maryland.
    Retting RA; Farmer CM; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 18836954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of automated speed enforcement on Loop 101 freeway in Scottsdale, Arizona.
    Retting RA; Kyrychenko SY; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1506-12. PubMed ID: 18606284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of red light cameras on violations and crashes: a review of the international literature.
    Retting RA; Ferguson SA; Hakkert AS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Mar; 4(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 14522657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.