These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24471388)

  • 1. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction.
    Renker M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; O'Brien TX; Zwerner PL; Meyer M; Kerl JM; Bauer RW; Fink C; Vogl TJ; Henzler T
    Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 21693660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection.
    Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Gibbs KP; Yu W; Li M; Zhang Z
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 22981731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths.
    Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Nance JW; Lv B; Yang H; Li F; Lu D; Zhang Z
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24625599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Negatively Impacts the Risk Category Based on Agatston Score: A Study Combining Coronary Calcium Score Measurement and Coronary CT Angiography.
    Wang W; Zhao YE; Qi L; Zhou CS; Lu MJ; Yang JX; Zhang LJ; Lu GM
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6909130. PubMed ID: 32733949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction?
    Yang WJ; Yan FH; Liu B; Pang LF; Hou L; Zhang H; Pan ZL; Chen KM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 23493224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.
    Kurata A; Dharampal A; Dedic A; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP; Dijkshoorn ML; Nieman K
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):3246-52. PubMed ID: 24057202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic assessment of coronary calcium detectability and quantification on four generations of CT reconstruction techniques: a patient and phantom study.
    Dobrolinska MM; van Praagh GD; Oostveen LJ; Poelhekken K; Greuter MJW; Fleischmann D; Willemink MJ; de Lange F; Slart RHJA; Leiner T; van der Werf NR
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 39(1):221-231. PubMed ID: 36598691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing.
    Spears JR; Schoepf UJ; Henzler T; Joshi G; Moscariello A; Vliegenthart R; Cho YJ; Apfaltrer P; Rowe G; Weininger M; Ebersberger U
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 24360635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction: A within-patient analysis.
    den Harder AM; Wolterink JM; Willemink MJ; Schilham AMR; de Jong PA; Budde RPJ; Nathoe HM; Išgum I; Leiner T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2152-2159. PubMed ID: 27776671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low tube voltage intermediate tube current liver MDCT: sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Yu MH; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Baek JH; Han JK; Choi BI; Flohr TG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23789655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.