These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24471388)
21. Low-dose chest computed tomography with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction, iterative reconstruction in image space, and filtered back projection: studies on image quality. Hwang HJ; Seo JB; Lee HJ; Lee SM; Kim EY; Oh SY; Kim JE J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 23863540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Tricarico F; Hlavacek AM; Schoepf UJ; Ebersberger U; Nance JW; Vliegenthart R; Cho YJ; Spears JR; Secchi F; Savino G; Marano R; Schoenberg SO; Bonomo L; Apfaltrer P Eur Radiol; 2013 May; 23(5):1306-15. PubMed ID: 23207869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT. Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With Iterative Reconstruction. Braber TL; Willemink MJ; Bohté EH; Mosterd A; Leiner T; Velthuis BK J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 26720203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraindividual comparison of diagnostic performance in patients with hepatic metastasis of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source abdominal computed tomography. Park M; Chung YE; Lee HS; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 24300843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image Quality of CT Angiography of Supra-Aortic Arteries : Comparison Between Advanced Modelled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE), Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) and Filtered Back Projection (FBP) in One Patients' Group. Örgel A; Bier G; Hennersdorf F; Richter H; Ernemann U; Hauser TK Clin Neuroradiol; 2020 Mar; 30(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30397728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration using iterative beam-hardening calcium correction reconstruction. Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Canstein C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():29-34. PubMed ID: 28629567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring with tube current reduction by 75%, using an adaptive iterative reconstruction algorithm. Luhur R; Schuijf JD; Mews J; Blobel J; Hamm B; Lembcke A Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170678. PubMed ID: 29260893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of isotropic calcium using 0.5-mm reconstructions from 320-row CT data sets identifies more patients with non-zero Agatston score and more subclinical atherosclerosis than standard 3.0-mm coronary artery calcium scan and CT angiography. Aslam A; Khokhar US; Chaudhry A; Abramowicz A; Rajper N; Cortegiano M; Poon M; Voros S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24582044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring. Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization. Layritz C; Schmid J; Achenbach S; Ulzheimer S; Wuest W; May M; Ropers D; Klinghammer L; Daniel WG; Pflederer T; Lell M Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 15(11):1238-45. PubMed ID: 24939952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image quality and radiation dose of low dose coronary CT angiography in obese patients: sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection. Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Reddy RP; Zhang C; Yu W; Liu Y; Zhang Z Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3141-5. PubMed ID: 22578834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns? Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques. Otgonbaatar C; Jeon PH; Ryu JK; Shim H; Jeon SH; Ko SM; Kim H Acta Radiol; 2023 Aug; 64(8):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 37211615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physician preference between low-dose computed tomography with a sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm and routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection in abdominopelvic imaging. Hardie AD; Tipnis SV; Rieter WJ; Rissing MS; De Cecco CN J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):932-6. PubMed ID: 24270115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]