These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24472123)
1. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses. Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models. Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins. Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations? Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle. Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations. Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins. Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires. Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle. Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups. Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny. Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows. Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits. Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor. Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle. Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP. Brzáková M; Bauer J; Steyn Y; Šplíchal J; Fulínová D J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36334266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle. Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autoregressive single-step test-day model for genomic evaluations of Portuguese Holstein cattle. Silva AA; Silva DA; Silva FF; Costa CN; Lopes PS; Caetano AR; Thompson G; Carvalheira J J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jul; 102(7):6330-6339. PubMed ID: 31056320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle. Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]