These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24473241)

  • 1. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
    Sanchis-Gomar F
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dear DORA.
    Jacobs H
    EMBO Rep; 2013 Nov; 14(11):947. PubMed ID: 24169601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
    Ploegh H
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
    Maffia P
    Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
    Lomnicki A
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
    Cintas P
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
    Insall R
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transparency showcases strength of peer review.
    Pulverer B
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):29-31. PubMed ID: 21048742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
    List A
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
    Waheed AA
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
    Connerade JP
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
    Brookfield J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals.
    Sebire NJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentaries on peer review and the evolving journal.
    Freeman MP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1598. PubMed ID: 20031099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
    Tregoning J
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7710):345. PubMed ID: 29921857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications.
    Thomaz PG; Assad RS; Moreira LF
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 96(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21445465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.