These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24474094)

  • 1. Patch tests.
    Lazzarini R; Duarte I; Ferreira AL
    An Bras Dermatol; 2013; 88(6):879-88. PubMed ID: 24474094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitfalls in Patch Testing: Minimizing the Risk of Avoidable False-Negative Reactions.
    Ophaug S; Schwarzenberger K
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 32475507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls in patch testing.
    Elston D; Licata A; Rudner E; Trotter K
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Sep; 11(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 11012008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive Occluded Patch Test in the Face of Negative Repeat Open Application Test.
    Goldminz AM; Wald MS; Scheinman PL
    Dermatitis; 2018; 29(3):162-163. PubMed ID: 29762209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dupilumab for allergic contact dermatitis and implications for patch testing: Irreconcilable differences.
    Shah P; Milam EC; Lo Sicco KI; Cohen DE
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Sep; 83(3):e215-e216. PubMed ID: 32417419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
    Bruze M; Condé-Salazar L; Goossens A; Kanerva L; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):241-50. PubMed ID: 10554056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Day 4 is better than day 3 for a single patch test reading.
    Todd DJ; Handley J; Metwali M; Allen GE; Burrows D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):402-4. PubMed ID: 8879925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pediatric allergic contact dermatitis. Part 2: Patch testing series, procedure, and unique scenarios.
    Neale H; Garza-Mayers AC; Tam I; Yu J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Feb; 84(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 33217511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Italian Guidelines in Patch Testing - adapted from the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD).
    Stingeni L; Bianchi L; Hansel K; Corazza M; Gallo R; Guarneri F; Patruno C; Rigano L; Romita P; Pigatto PD; Calzavara-Pinton P;
    G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jun; 154(3):227-253. PubMed ID: 30717577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to use the reaction index and positivity ratio.
    Brasch J; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jul; 59(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 18598314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Keir J; English J; Fergie N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EAACI position paper for practical patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis in children.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Darsow U; Mortz CG; Orton D; Worm M; Muraro A; Schmid-Grendelmeier P; Grimalt R; Spiewak R; Rudzeviciene O; Flohr C; Halken S; Fiocchi A; Borrego LM; Oranje AP
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2015 Nov; 26(7):598-606. PubMed ID: 26287570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
    Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Performing patch testing with contact allergens].
    ; ; Schnuch A; Aberer W; Agathos M; Becker D; Brasch J; Elsner P; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Geier J; Hillen U; Löffler H; Mahler V; Richter G; Szliska C;
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Sep; 6(9):770-5. PubMed ID: 19000065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patch Testing Pearls.
    Uyesugi BA; Sheehan MP
    Clin Rev Allergy Immunol; 2019 Feb; 56(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30269296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patch Testing During Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Systematic Review.
    Mufti A; Lu JD; Sachdeva M; Zaaroura H; Kashetsky N; Yeung J; Maibach HI; DeKoven J
    Dermatitis; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 32(6):365-374. PubMed ID: 33896928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
    Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The positivity ratio--another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation.
    Geier J; Uter W; Lessmann H; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 May; 48(5):280-2. PubMed ID: 12868978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.