275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24475851)
1. Quantitative assessment of pancreatic fat by using unenhanced CT: pathologic correlation and clinical implications.
Kim SY; Kim H; Cho JY; Lim S; Cha K; Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim JH; Yoon YS; Han HS; Kang HS
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 24475851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Nishibori H; Sakurai K; Miyazawa D; Watanabe H; Kondo H; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21406629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the degree of pancreatic fatty infiltration by area-based assessment of CT images: comparison with histopathology-based and CT attenuation index-based assessments.
Hori M; Onaya H; Hiraoka N; Yamaji T; Kobayashi H; Takahashi M; Mutoh M; Shimada K; Nakagama H
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):667-676. PubMed ID: 27581428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Tranchart H; Gaujoux S; Rebours V; Vullierme MP; Dokmak S; Levy P; Couvelard A; Belghiti J; Sauvanet A
Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 22609844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of CT methods for determining the fat content of the liver.
Kodama Y; Ng CS; Wu TT; Ayers GD; Curley SA; Abdalla EK; Vauthey JN; Charnsangavej C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1307-12. PubMed ID: 17449775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreatic Steatosis and Fibrosis: Quantitative Assessment with Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging.
Yoon JH; Lee JM; Lee KB; Kim SW; Kang MJ; Jang JY; Kannengiesser S; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 26566228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity.
Brook OR; Gourtsoyianni S; Brook A; Siewert B; Kent T; Raptopoulos V
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 23674791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visceral adiposity and hepatic steatosis at abdominal CT: association with the metabolic syndrome.
Pickhardt PJ; Jee Y; O'Connor SD; del Rio AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 22528899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factor analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, with a focus on pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour.
Maeda K; Kuriyama N; Yuge T; Ito T; Gyoten K; Hayasaki A; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Tanemura A; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H; Mizuno S
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):240. PubMed ID: 35733145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic adenocarcinomas: analysis of enhancement patterns and secondary signs with multiphasic multidetector CT.
Yoon SH; Lee JM; Cho JY; Lee KB; Kim JE; Moon SK; Kim SJ; Baek JH; Kim SH; Kim SH; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):442-52. PubMed ID: 21406627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of Independent Association Between Fatty Pancreas and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: 5-Year Japanese Cohort Study.
Yamazaki H; Tsuboya T; Katanuma A; Kodama Y; Tauchi S; Dohke M; Maguchi H
Diabetes Care; 2016 Oct; 39(10):1677-83. PubMed ID: 27422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of fatty pancreas by proton density fat fraction using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pancreatic cancer.
Fukui H; Hori M; Fukuda Y; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Ogawa K; Ninomiya K; Tatsumi M; Osuga K; Yamada D; Eguchi H; Miyoshi E; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():25-31. PubMed ID: 31439250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: correlation with MR imaging findings--preliminary results.
Watanabe H; Kanematsu M; Tanaka K; Osada S; Tomita H; Hara A; Goshima S; Kondo H; Kawada H; Noda Y; Tanahashi Y; Kawai N; Yoshida K; Moriyama N
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 24475834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biopsy-proven nonsteatotic liver in adults: estimation of reference range for difference in attenuation between the liver and the spleen at nonenhanced CT.
Park YS; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim DY; Shin YM; Lee W; Lee SG; Yu ES
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):760-6. PubMed ID: 21212369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: reassessment of response with CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Cassinotto C; Mouries A; Lafourcade JP; Terrebonne E; Belleannée G; Blanc JF; Lapuyade B; Vendrely V; Laurent C; Chiche L; Wagner T; Sa-Cunha A; Gaye D; Trillaud H; Laurent F; Montaudon M
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24960211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a DIXON-based fat quantification technique for the measurement of visceral fat using a CT-based reference standard.
Heckman KM; Otemuyiwa B; Chenevert TL; Malyarenko D; Derstine BA; Wang SC; Davenport MS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):346-354. PubMed ID: 29946923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic Parenchymal Heterogeneity on Contrast-enhanced CT Scans Following Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy: Natural History and Association with Clinical Evidence of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome.
Han NY; Park BJ; Kim MJ; Sung DJ; Cho SB
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):766-74. PubMed ID: 25822471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase.
Sahni VA; Shinagare AB; Silverman SG
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 22974566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
