247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24477546)
21. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners.
Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Emadi G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):967-81. PubMed ID: 17672645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Holden TA; Zwolan TA; Arts HA; Firszt JB; Buswinka CJ; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Jun; 21(3):259-275. PubMed ID: 32342256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.
Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2372-84. PubMed ID: 10491701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
Cohen LT; Saunders E; Clark GM
Hear Res; 2001 May; 155(1-2):63-81. PubMed ID: 11335077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of intracochlear electrode position and correlation with behavioural thresholds in CII and 90K cochlear implants.
Filipo R; Mancini P; Panebianco V; Viccaro M; Covelli E; Vergari V; Passariello R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18274915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Busby PA; Arora K
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
Holden LK; Finley CC; Firszt JB; Holden TA; Brenner C; Potts LG; Gotter BD; Vanderhoof SS; Mispagel K; Heydebrand G; Skinner MW
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):342-60. PubMed ID: 23348845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Polarity Sensitivity as a Potential Correlate of Neural Degeneration in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mesnildrey Q; Venail F; Carlyon RP; Macherey O
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 32020417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.
Sagi E; Svirsky MA
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():316-328. PubMed ID: 30396747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.
De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.
Skinner MW; Ketten DR; Holden LK; Harding GW; Smith PG; Gates GA; Neely JG; Kletzker GR; Brunsden B; Blocker B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 3(3):332-50. PubMed ID: 12382107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.
Goehring T; Archer-Boyd A; Deeks JM; Arenberg JG; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 20(4):431-448. PubMed ID: 31161338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
