These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24478802)

  • 1. Implications of sex-specific selection for the genetic basis of disease.
    Morrow EH; Connallon T
    Evol Appl; 2013 Dec; 6(8):1208-17. PubMed ID: 24478802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex-specific natural selection on SNPs in
    Delph LF; Brown KE; Ríos LD; Kelly JK
    Evol Lett; 2022 Aug; 6(4):308-318. PubMed ID: 35937470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary Consequences of Sex-Specific Selection in Variable Environments: Four Simple Models Reveal Diverse Evolutionary Outcomes.
    Connallon T; Sharma S; Olito C
    Am Nat; 2019 Jan; 193(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 30624102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-sex genetic correlations for fitness and fitness components: Connecting theoretical predictions to empirical patterns.
    Connallon T; Matthews G
    Evol Lett; 2019 Jun; 3(3):254-262. PubMed ID: 31171981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-insemination sexual selection in males indirectly masculinizes the female transcriptome.
    Kasimatis KR; Willis JH; Phillips PC
    bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of sexually dimorphic traits in ecological gradients: an interplay between natural and sexual selection in hummingbirds.
    Beltrán DF; Araya-Salas M; Parra JL; Stiles FG; Rico-Guevara A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 289(1989):20221783. PubMed ID: 36515116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 22298707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ontogenetic stage-specific quantitative trait loci contribute to divergence in developmental trajectories of sexually dimorphic fins between medaka populations.
    Kawajiri M; Yoshida K; Fujimoto S; Mokodongan DF; Ravinet M; Kirkpatrick M; Yamahira K; Kitano J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Nov; 23(21):5258-75. PubMed ID: 25251151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae).
    Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1965-75. PubMed ID: 16261734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):919-37. PubMed ID: 21220356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex-Specific Selection and the Evolution of Between-Sex Genetic Covariance.
    McGlothlin JW; Cox RM; Brodie ED
    J Hered; 2019 Jul; 110(4):422-432. PubMed ID: 31095325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexually Antagonistic Variation and the Evolution of Dimorphic Sexual Systems.
    Olito C; Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2019 May; 193(5):688-701. PubMed ID: 31002570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon.
    Barson NJ; Aykanat T; Hindar K; Baranski M; Bolstad GH; Fiske P; Jacq C; Jensen AJ; Johnston SE; Karlsson S; Kent M; Moen T; Niemelä E; Nome T; Næsje TF; Orell P; Romakkaniemi A; Sægrov H; Urdal K; Erkinaro J; Lien S; Primmer CR
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):405-8. PubMed ID: 26536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.
    Grieshop K; Berger D; Arnqvist G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28606137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects.
    Teder T; Kaasik A; Taits K; Tammaru T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2461-2475. PubMed ID: 34128582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bedhomme S; Chippindale AK; Prasad NG; Delcourt M; Abbott JK; Mallet MA; Rundle HD
    J Genet; 2011 Dec; 90(3):443-52. PubMed ID: 22227931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex-specific trait architecture in a spider with sexual size dimorphism.
    Kralj-Fišer S; Kuntner M; Debes PV
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Oct; 36(10):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37702091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.