These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24478823)

  • 21. The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas.
    Dorrough AR; Glöckner A; Hellmann DM; Ebert I
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():476. PubMed ID: 25972821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of warmth and competence on the promotion of safe in-group selection: Stereotype content model and social categorization of faces.
    Ponsi G; Panasiti MS; Scandola M; Aglioti SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1464-79. PubMed ID: 26288181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in Explicit Stereotype Activation among Social Groups Based on the Stereotype Content Model: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Chinese Sample.
    Yang Y; White KRG; Fan X; Xu Q; Chen QW
    Brain Sci; 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33348655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?
    Richetin J; Durante F; Mari S; Perugini M; Volpato C
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(4):417-35. PubMed ID: 22822683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stereotype content and morality: How competence and warmth arise from morally significant interactions.
    Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Oct; 57(4):834-854. PubMed ID: 29956352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
    Balliet D; Wu J; De Dreu CK
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1556-81. PubMed ID: 25222635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When shared group membership signifies shared subjective experience: I-sharing and the minimal group paradigm.
    Long AE; Pinel EC; Yawger GC
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 27668756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability.
    Rohmer O; Louvet E
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Dec; 51(4):732-40. PubMed ID: 22303819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Group boundary permeability moderates the effect of a dependency meta-stereotype on help-seeking behaviour.
    Zhang L; Kou Y; Zhao Y; Fu X
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 51(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 25885332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups.
    Noel JG; Wann DL; Branscombe NR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Jan; 68(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 7861310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What emotional tears convey: Tearful individuals are seen as warmer, but also as less competent.
    van de Ven N; Meijs MH; Vingerhoets A
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Mar; 56(1):146-160. PubMed ID: 27709633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism in social identity perspective].
    Oishi C; Yoshida F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Dec; 73(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 12625238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low- status groups.
    Oldmeadow JA; Fiske ST
    Group Process Intergroup Relat; 2010 Jul; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 24319344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does Perceiving the Poor as Warm and the Rich as Cold Enhance Perceived Social Justice? The Effects of Activating Compensatory Stereotypes on Justice Perception.
    Fu A; Zhang Z; He W; Lin Z; Wu N; Hou G; Yao T
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1361. PubMed ID: 31275198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of exemplar activation on mental representations of the ingroup: the moderating role of relative ingroup size.
    Coats S; Bayer ER; Worthen JB
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 17650919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing to ingroup and outgroup members: Do we assimilate, contrast, or neither?
    Bruchmann K; Evans MC
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(3):313-327. PubMed ID: 29847226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mapping Ethnic Stereotypes and Their Antecedents in Russia: The Stereotype Content Model.
    Grigoryev D; Fiske ST; Batkhina A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1643. PubMed ID: 31379677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.
    Durrheim K; Quayle M; Tredoux CG; Titlestad K; Tooke L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165974. PubMed ID: 27851791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Social categorization and stereotyping: 'You mean I'm one of "them"?'.
    Johnson C; Schaller M; Mullen B
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2000 Mar; 39 ( Pt 1)():1-25. PubMed ID: 10774525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.