These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24479483)

  • 1. Kinematic determinants of weapon velocity during the fencing lunge in experienced épée fencers.
    Bottoms L; Greenhalgh A; Sinclair J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(4):109-13. PubMed ID: 24479483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical insights into the determinants of speed in the fencing lunge.
    Guan Y; Guo L; Wu N; Zhang L; Warburton DER
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Mar; 18(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 29249174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in patellofemoral load during the epee fencing lunge.
    Sinclair J; Bottoms L
    Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25630246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Fencers Require a Weapon-Specific Approach to Strength and Conditioning Training?
    Turner AN; Bishop CJ; Cree JA; Edwards ML; Chavda S; Read PJ; Kirby DMJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 28538318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of forward and lateral lunges at varying step lengths.
    Riemann B; Congleton A; Ward R; Davies GJ
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2013 Apr; 53(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 23584319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of nonleading foot placement on power and velocity in the fencing lunge.
    Gresham-Fiegel CN; House PD; Zupan MF
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jan; 27(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22395272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise.
    Farrokhi S; Pollard CD; Souza RB; Chen YJ; Reischl S; Powers CM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2008 Jul; 38(7):403-9. PubMed ID: 18591759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic determinants of scoring success in the fencing flick: Logistic and linear multiple regression analysis.
    Michaelsen AN; Cleland CL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222075. PubMed ID: 31553734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flèche versus Lunge as the Optimal Footwork Technique in Fencing.
    Borysiuk Z; Markowska N; Konieczny M; Kręcisz K; Błaszczyszyn M; Nikolaidis PT; Knechtle B; Pakosz P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31261979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of uncertainty during the lunge in fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Dávila M; Zingsem C; Gutiérrez-Cruz C; Giles FJ; Rojas FJ
    J Sports Sci Med; 2014 Jan; 13(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 24570607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studying fencing lunge accuracy and response time in uncertain conditions with an innovative simulator.
    Sorel A; Plantard P; Bideau N; Pontonnier C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0218959. PubMed ID: 31287814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patellofemoral compressive force and stress during the forward and side lunges with and without a stride.
    Escamilla RF; Zheng N; MacLeod TD; Edwards WB; Hreljac A; Fleisig GS; Wilk KE; Moorman CT; Imamura R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1026-37. PubMed ID: 18632195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of uncertainty on the reaction response in fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Dávila M; Javier Rojas F; Antonio R; Navarro E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Mar; 84(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 23611004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of defence response time during lunge in foil fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Cruz C; Rojas FJ; Gutiérrez-Davila M
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(7):651-7. PubMed ID: 26185981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shoe choice may affect fencing lunge attack performance.
    Wang ST; Chang CC; Chao T; Nicholls A; Tsai YS
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1276025. PubMed ID: 38419727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response timing in the lunge and target change in elite versus medium-level fencers.
    Gutierrez-Davila M; Rojas FJ; Antonio R; Navarro E
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 23834541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time Required to Initiate a Defensive Reaction to Direct and Feint Attacks in Fencing.
    Gutiérrez-Davila M; Rojas FJ; Gutiérrez-Cruz C; García C; Navarro E
    J Appl Biomech; 2016 Dec; 32(6):548-552. PubMed ID: 27400434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the validity of two-dimensional video analysis for measuring lower limb joint angles during fencing lunge.
    Chida K; Inami T; Yamaguchi S; Nishioka T; Yoshida Y; Kohtake N
    Front Sports Act Living; 2024; 6():1335272. PubMed ID: 38419910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hamstring extensibility and transverse plane knee control relationship in athletic women.
    Nyland J; Caborn DN; Shapiro R; Johnson DL; Fang H
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1999; 7(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10462218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The phenomenon of anticipation in fencing. An applicability approach.
    Borysiuk Z; Konieczny M; Błaszczyszyn M; Błach W; Obmiński Z
    Front Sports Act Living; 2024; 6():1387013. PubMed ID: 38725473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.