These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24479641)

  • 1. Sustainable yield in theory and practice: bridging scientific and mainstream vernacular.
    Rudestam K; Langridge R
    Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1():90-9. PubMed ID: 24479641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling sustainable groundwater management: packaging and sequencing of policy interventions.
    Esteban E; Dinar A
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Apr; 119():93-102. PubMed ID: 23467104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecosystem services in sustainable groundwater management.
    Tuinstra J; van Wensem J
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 485-486():798-803. PubMed ID: 24739892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural recharge to sustainable yield from the barind aquifer: a tool in preparing effective management plan of groundwater resources.
    Monirul Islam M; Kanungoe P
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):251-8. PubMed ID: 16477993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards sustainable groundwater use: setting long-term goals, backcasting, and managing adaptively.
    Gleeson T; Alley WM; Allen DM; Sophocleous MA; Zhou Y; Taniguchi M; VanderSteen J
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Groundwater Realities in California.
    Hauge C
    Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):764-767. PubMed ID: 27732745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Climate change impact assessment on Veneto and Friuli Plain groundwater. Part I: an integrated modeling approach for hazard scenario construction.
    Baruffi F; Cisotto A; Cimolino A; Ferri M; Monego M; Norbiato D; Cappelletto M; Bisaglia M; Pretner A; Galli A; Scarinci A; Marsala V; Panelli C; Gualdi S; Bucchignani E; Torresan S; Pasini S; Critto A; Marcomini A
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Dec; 440():154-66. PubMed ID: 22940008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing adaptive capacity within groundwater abstraction management systems.
    Holman IP; Trawick P
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jun; 92(6):1542-9. PubMed ID: 21288633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece.
    Stefanopoulos K; Yang H; Gemitzi A; Tsagarakis KP
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():26-33. PubMed ID: 24121661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Irrigated agriculture and groundwater resources - towards an integrated vision and sustainable relationship.
    Foster S; Garduño H
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23508138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solar and wind energy enhances drought resilience and groundwater sustainability.
    He X; Feng K; Li X; Craft AB; Wada Y; Burek P; Wood EF; Sheffield J
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):4893. PubMed ID: 31695029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term (1930-2010) trends in groundwater levels in Texas: influences of soils, landcover and water use.
    Chaudhuri S; Ale S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():379-90. PubMed ID: 24867702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A provider-based water planning and management model--WaterSim 4.0--for the Phoenix Metropolitan Area.
    Sampson DA; Escobar V; Tschudi MK; Lant T; Gober P
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2596-610. PubMed ID: 21719188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Workshop 7b (synthesis): sustainable groundwater management in rural areas.
    Shah T; Cederwall K; Egboka B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(8):165. PubMed ID: 16007944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Groundwater environmental capacity and its evaluation index.
    Xing LT; Wu Q; Ye CH; Ye N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Oct; 169(1-4):217-27. PubMed ID: 19763854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From the 1996 groundwater action programme to the 2006 groundwater directive--what have we done, what have we learnt, what is the way ahead?
    Quevauviller P
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Apr; 10(4):408-21. PubMed ID: 18385860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating farm performance using agri-environmental indicators: recent experiences for nitrogen management in The Netherlands.
    Langeveld JW; Verhagen A; Neeteson JJ; van Keulen H; Conijn JG; Schils RL; Oenema J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 82(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 17092629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Groundwater resources management through the applications of simulation modeling: a review.
    Singh A
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 499():414-23. PubMed ID: 24880901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Bayesian belief networks for dealing with ambiguity in integrated groundwater management.
    Henriksen HJ; Zorrilla-Miras P; de la Hera A; Brugnach M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):430-44. PubMed ID: 21702081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Groundwater Governance in a Water-Starved Country: Public Policy, Farmers' Perceptions, and Drivers of Tubewell Adoption in Balochistan, Pakistan.
    Khair SM; Mushtaq S; Reardon-Smith K
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 25158825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.