BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24480305)

  • 1. Impact of changes in mortality on FRAX-derived fracture probabilities.
    Kreidieh OI; El-Hajj Fuleihan G
    Bone; 2014 May; 62():43-50. PubMed ID: 24480305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and application of FRAX in the management of osteoporosis in Ireland.
    McGowan B; Kanis JA; Johansson H; Silke C; Whelan B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():146. PubMed ID: 23982943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women.
    Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture burden in relation to low bone mineral density and FRAX(®) probability.
    Leslie WD; Morin S
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 21723761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FRAX-based Estimates of 10-year Probability of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fracture Among Adults Aged 40 and Over: United States, 2013 and 2014.
    Looker AC; Sarafrazi Isfahani N; Fan B; Shepherd JA
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2017 Mar; (103):1-16. PubMed ID: 28459415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of a FRAX revision for the USA.
    Kanis JA; Johansson H; Oden A; Dawson-Hughes B; Melton LJ; McCloskey EV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jan; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19705047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of FRAX(®) model calibration on intervention rates: a simulation study.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM;
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 21723769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP Study cohort.
    González-Macías J; Marin F; Vila J; Díez-Pérez A
    Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):373-7. PubMed ID: 22129640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the FRAX model for hip fracture predictions in the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE).
    Sund R; Honkanen R; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey E; Kanis J; Kröger H
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2014 Jul; 95(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 24792689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model.
    Grigorie D; Sucaliuc A; Johansson H; Kanis JA; McCloskey E
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2013 May; 92(5):429-36. PubMed ID: 23334302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-year probability of osteoporotic fracture in 2012 Polish women assessed by FRAX and nomogram by Nguyen et al.-Conformity between methods and their clinical utility.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Leszczynski P; Sewerynek E; Wichrowska H; Napiorkowska L; Kostyk T; Stuss M; Stepien-Klos W; Golba KS; Drozdzowska B
    Bone; 2010 Jun; 46(6):1661-7. PubMed ID: 20156606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence of hip fracture in Barranquilla, Colombia, and the development of a Colombian FRAX model.
    Jaller-Raad JJ; Jaller-Char JJ; Lechuga-Ortiz JA; Navarro-Lechuga E; Johansson H; Kanis JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2013 Jul; 93(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 23471427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FRAX calculator and Garvan nomogram in male osteoporotic population.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Sewerynek E; Leszczynski P; Wichrowska H; Napiórkowska L; Stuss M; Ptaszek A; Kostyk T; Golba KS; Garbacz W; Drozdzowska B
    Aging Male; 2014 Sep; 17(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 24456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration of FRAX ® 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures.
    Lalmohamed A; Welsing PM; Lems WF; Jacobs JW; Kanis JA; Johansson H; De Boer A; De Vries F
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 22120910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
    Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
    Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Osteoporosis - whom to treat? The importance of FRAX® in Switzerland].
    Lippuner K
    Ther Umsch; 2012 Mar; 69(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 22403115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology of hip fracture in Belarus: development of a country-specific FRAX model and its comparison to neighboring country models.
    Ramanau H; Chernyanin I; Rudenka E; Lesnyak O; Zakroyeva A; Bilezikian JP; Johansson H; Harvey NC; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Apr; 13(1):42. PubMed ID: 29666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
    Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.