BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24480533)

  • 21. Assessing the criminal capacity of children: a challenge to the capacity of mental health professionals.
    Pillay AL; Willows C
    J Child Adolesc Ment Health; 2015; 27(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 26357915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does recent research on adolescent brain development inform the mature minor doctrine?
    Steinberg L
    J Med Philos; 2013 Jun; 38(3):256-67. PubMed ID: 23607975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Apology in the criminal justice setting: evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system.
    Petrucci CJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):337-62. PubMed ID: 12210972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Justice policy reform for high-risk juveniles: using science to achieve large-scale crime reduction.
    Skeem JL; Scott E; Mulvey EP
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():709-39. PubMed ID: 24437434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. But he knew it was wrong: evaluating adolescent culpability.
    Ash P
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 22396338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Newsmaker interview: Laurence Steinberg. Supreme Court cites science in limiting punishments for juveniles. Interview by Greg Miller.
    Steinberg L
    Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6090):25. PubMed ID: 22767907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mens Rea and Methamphetamine: High Time for a Modern Doctrine Acknowledging the Neuroscience of Addiction.
    Cusick M
    Fordham Law Rev; 2017 Apr; 85(5):2417-49. PubMed ID: 28379674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The alcoholic offender--significance for determination of guilt. A legal view].
    Maatz KR
    Nervenarzt; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1389-401. PubMed ID: 15931539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More than a feeling: integrating empathy into the study of lawmaking, lawbreaking, and reactions to lawbreaking.
    Posick C; Rocque M; Rafter N
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Jan; 58(1):5-26. PubMed ID: 23188925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assisted suicide issue moves to Supreme Court.
    United States Catholic Conference
    Origins; 1996 Dec; 26(26):421, 423-430. PubMed ID: 11660269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sentencing convicted juvenile felony offenders in the adult court: the direct effects of race.
    Howell RJ; Hutto TS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):782-99. PubMed ID: 22592862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IsTeen Court effective for repeat offenders? A test of the restorative justice approach.
    Forgays DK; DeMilio L
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Feb; 49(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 15616115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Life after life: Recidivism among individuals formerly sentenced to mandatory juvenile life without parole.
    Sbeglia C; Simmons C; Icenogle G; Levick M; Peniche M; Beardslee J; Cauffman E
    J Res Adolesc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38845089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
    Semple JK; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Desistance mandates compared with treatment mandates in criminal justice populations.
    Kleiman MA; Kilmer B; Hawken A
    Addiction; 2017 May; 112(5):748-750. PubMed ID: 27873375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neuroscience. Crime, culpability, and the adolescent brain.
    Beckman M
    Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5684):596-9. PubMed ID: 15286340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Community sentiment and the juvenile offender: should juveniles charged with felony murder be waived into the adult criminal justice system?
    Garberg NM; Libkuman TM
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):553-75. PubMed ID: 19437541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Forensic psychologist's considerations about the new law regulation in cases of sexual crimes].
    Gierowski JK
    Psychiatr Pol; 2012; 46(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 23214146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility.
    Eastman N; Campbell C
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 7(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 16552416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Personality disorders and biosocial trait theories: The argument for radical legal reform.
    Peters DC
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 20422651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.