BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24480944)

  • 1. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):678-82. PubMed ID: 24480944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Neck Disability Index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 24905392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology.
    Mueller B; Carreon LY; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):757-61. PubMed ID: 23124265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; McDonough CM; Rampersaud R; Berven S; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2085-9. PubMed ID: 19730215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Owens RK; Crawford CH; Puno RM; Bratcher KR; McGraw KE; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 27153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should the EuroQol-Five Dimensions Replace the Oswestry Disability Index When Tracking Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression Outcomes?
    Knio ZO; VanHorn TA; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e566-e571. PubMed ID: 31678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain.
    Whynes DK; McCahon RA; Ravenscroft A; Hodgkinson V; Evley R; Hardman JG
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 23337223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soer R; Reneman MF; Speijer BL; Coppes MH; Vroomen PC
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23199409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.