These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24480944)

  • 1. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Oswestry Disability Index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):678-82. PubMed ID: 24480944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating EQ-5D values from the Neck Disability Index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Das N; Nienhuis JB; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 24905392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology.
    Mueller B; Carreon LY; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):757-61. PubMed ID: 23124265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; McDonough CM; Rampersaud R; Berven S; Shainline M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2085-9. PubMed ID: 19730215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Owens RK; Crawford CH; Puno RM; Bratcher KR; McGraw KE; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 27153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should the EuroQol-Five Dimensions Replace the Oswestry Disability Index When Tracking Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression Outcomes?
    Knio ZO; VanHorn TA; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e566-e571. PubMed ID: 31678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D health-related quality-of-life instrument in assessing low back pain.
    Whynes DK; McCahon RA; Ravenscroft A; Hodgkinson V; Evley R; Hardman JG
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 23337223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinimetric properties of the EuroQol-5D in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Soer R; Reneman MF; Speijer BL; Coppes MH; Vroomen PC
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23199409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.