198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24481755)
1. Chest radiography: new technological developments and their applications.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2014 Feb; 35(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 24481755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Li F; Engelmann R; Roberts R; Armato S
J Thorac Imaging; 2008 May; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 18520564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of lung nodules. New opportunities in chest radiography].
Pötter-Lang S; Schalekamp S; Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M
Radiologe; 2014 May; 54(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 24789046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography improves performance of a next generation computer-aided detection program.
Balkman JD; Mehandru S; DuPont E; Novak RD; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20160602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy imaging of the chest: optimization of image acquisition techniques for the 'bone-only' image.
Shkumat NA; Siewerdsen JH; Richard S; Paul NS; Yorkston J; Van Metter R
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):629-32. PubMed ID: 18383684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy subtraction radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: initial evaluations in human clinical cases.
Gomi T; Nozaki M; Takeda T; Umeda T; Takahashi K; Nakajima M
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 24119347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual energy subtraction digital radiography: technical considerations, clinical applications, and imaging pitfalls.
Gilkeson RC; Sachs PB
J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Nov; 21(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 17110857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal subtraction chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Armato SG
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19577872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal subtraction of dual-energy chest radiographs.
Armato SG; Doshi DJ; Engelmann R; Caligiuri P; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1911-9. PubMed ID: 16872098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lung nodule detection by microdose CT versus chest radiography (standard and dual-energy subtracted).
Ebner L; Bütikofer Y; Ott D; Huber A; Landau J; Roos JE; Heverhagen JT; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):727-35. PubMed ID: 25794062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-energy Subtraction Chest Radiography: Application in Cardiovascular Imaging.
Ansari-Gilani K; Tandon YK; Jordan DW; Ciancibello L; Wilson DL; Gilkeson RC
J Thorac Imaging; 2020 May; 35(3):W75-W81. PubMed ID: 32032249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved contralateral subtraction images by use of elastic matching technique.
Li Q; Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1934-42. PubMed ID: 10984239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of digital projection radiography with a CT apparatus for thoracic diagnosis].
Bautz W; Hübener KH; Kurtz B
Rofo; 1984 May; 140(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 6429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: with FCR 9501 ES].
Takashima T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Nov; 56(13):909-16. PubMed ID: 8969053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Naito H; Arisawa J; Tamura S; Kozuka T; Ito W; Shimura K; Kato H
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):407-12. PubMed ID: 7824718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]