117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24481993)
1. Do we still need studies on the value of the TIVAD for cancer patients?
Di Carlo I; Toro A
World J Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(8):2186. PubMed ID: 24481993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Morbidity of chemotherapy administration and satisfaction in breast cancer patients: a comparative study of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) versus peripheral venous access usage.
Singh KR; Agarwal G; Nanda G; Chand G; Mishra A; Agarwal A; Verma AK; Mishra SK; Goyal P
World J Surg; 2014 May; 38(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 24305930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prioritizing the expenses of breast cancer treatment makes sense- not just in developing countries, but across the globe.
Singh KR; Agarwal G
World J Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(8):2187-8. PubMed ID: 24737192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD.
Burbridge B; Goyal K
J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):527-534. PubMed ID: 27768211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hypnosis as adjunct therapy to conscious sedation for venous access device implantation in breast cancer: A pilot study.
Sterkers N; Chabrol JL; De Troyer J; Bonijol D; Darmon JC; Donnez O
J Vasc Access; 2018 Jul; 19(4):382-386. PubMed ID: 29566587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement: a modified technique that takes post-procedure aesthetic aspects into account.
Liberale G
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Apr; 25(4):1137-1140. PubMed ID: 27888350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trapezius Port Placement in Patients with Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up and Quality-of-Life Assessment.
Çil BE; Öcal O; Eldem FG; Peynircioğlu B; Balkancı F
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 30527656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient satisfaction and acceptance of their totally implanted central venous catheter: a French prospective multicenter study.
Marcy PY; Schiappa R; Ferrero JM; Dahlet C; Brenet O; Yazbec G; Dubois PY; Salm B; Fouche Y; Mari V; Montastruc M; Lebrec N; Ancel B; Paillocher N; Dupoiron D; Rangeard O; Gal J; Ettaiche M; Chateau Y; Chamorey E
J Vasc Access; 2017 Sep; 18(5):390-395. PubMed ID: 28731491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison Between Upper Arm and Chest for Optimal Site of Totally Implanted Venous Access Ports in Patients with Female Breast Cancer.
Yang SS; Ahn MS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 50():128-134. PubMed ID: 29481918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for introduction and use of a flexible plastic arterial catheter of small diameter.
PETERSON LH
Fed Proc; 1947; 6(1 Pt 2):179. PubMed ID: 20244231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally implanted venous access devices implanted in the saphenous vein. Relation between the reservoir site and comfort/discomfort of the patients.
Toro A; Mannino M; Cappello G; Celeste S; Cordio S; Di Carlo I
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 26(8):1127.e9-1127.e13. PubMed ID: 22951064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients.
Funaki B; Zaleski GX
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):1281. PubMed ID: 10527209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
Toro A; Schembari E; Mattone E; Di Carlo I
World J Surg; 2020 Mar; 44(3):1004-1005. PubMed ID: 31541273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy with trastuzumab for early-stage breast cancer.
Clemons M; Stober C; Kehoe A; Bedard D; MacDonald F; Brunet MC; Saunders D; Vandermeer L; Mazzarello S; Awan A; Basulaiman B; Robinson A; Mallick R; Hutton B; Fergusson D
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Oct; 28(10):4891-4899. PubMed ID: 32002617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous brachial venous access: tips and tricks.
Marcy PY; Giordana E; Amoretti N; El Hajjam M; Cissoko A; Lacout A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 Mar; 94(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 23395686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we need navigation systems in the vascular access practice? A case of peripherally inserted central catheter malposition.
Konstantinou EA; Birbas K; Katsoulas TA; Karampinis DF; Mariolis-Sapsakos TD; Kaklamanos I; Bonatsos G
J Vasc Access; 2014; 15(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 25041915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the perceptions and cosmetic satisfaction of breast cancer patients undergoing totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement.
Liberale G; El Houkayem M; Viste C; Bouazza F; Moreau M; El Nakadi I; Veys I
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Dec; 24(12):5035-5040. PubMed ID: 27495928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical application of totally implantable venous access ports for patients with breast cancer.
Zhang P; Mo X; Du J; Fan C
Asian J Surg; 2020 Sep; 43(9):944-945. PubMed ID: 32527582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple diagnostic test to confirm correct placement of intravenous catheters before chemotherapy.
Keidan I; Ben-Menachem E; Berger R; Derazne E; Berkenstadt H
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 25634149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
