These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24482328)

  • 1. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantum of truth? Querying the alternative benchmark for human cognition.
    Newell BR; van Ravenzwaaij D; Donkin C
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 23673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quantum geometric model of similarity.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grounding quantum probability in psychological mechanism.
    Love BC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):296. PubMed ID: 23673043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness.
    Blutner R; Pothos EM; Bruza P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):711-36. PubMed ID: 24039093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primer on quantum cognition.
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E53. PubMed ID: 31868156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's the predicted outcome? Explanatory and predictive properties of the quantum probability framework.
    Pleskac TJ; Kvam PD; Yu S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):303-4. PubMed ID: 23673050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cold and hot cognition: quantum probability theory and realistic psychological modeling.
    Corr PJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 23673029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On quantum models of the human mind.
    Wang H; Sun Y
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 24259276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantum probability and comparative cognition.
    Grace RC; Kemp S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):287. PubMed ID: 23673034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality.
    Oaksford M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):303. PubMed ID: 23673049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy.
    Tentori K; Crupi V
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.