These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24483287)

  • 1. Environmental performance of green building code and certification systems.
    Suh S; Tomar S; Leighton M; Kneifel J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(5):2551-60. PubMed ID: 24483287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life-cycle thinking and the LEED rating system: global perspective on building energy use and environmental impacts.
    Al-Ghamdi SG; Bilec MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4048-56. PubMed ID: 25706229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications.
    Rebitzer G; Ekvall T; Frischknecht R; Hunkeler D; Norris G; Rydberg T; Schmidt WP; Suh S; Weidema BP; Pennington DW
    Environ Int; 2004 Jul; 30(5):701-20. PubMed ID: 15051246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidisciplinary life cycle metrics and tools for green buildings.
    Helgeson JF; Lippiatt BC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jul; 5(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 20050028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An attributional life cycle assessment for an Italian residential multifamily building.
    Vitale P; Arena U
    Environ Technol; 2018 Dec; 39(23):3033-3045. PubMed ID: 28831851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Construction within the Industrialized Building Process: A Monetization and Building Information Modelling Approach.
    Yao F; Liu G; Ji Y; Tong W; Du X; Li K; Shrestha A; Martek I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33202770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels.
    Rogers K; Seager TP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 43(6):1718-23. PubMed ID: 19368162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposal of Environmental Impact Assessment Method for Concrete in South Korea: An Application in LCA (Life Cycle Assessment).
    Kim TH; Tae SH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27827843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].
    Shi XQ; Sun ZX; Li XN; Li JX; Yang JX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1105-16. PubMed ID: 25929083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice.
    Pennington DW; Potting J; Finnveden G; Lindeijer E; Jolliet O; Rydberg T; Rebitzer G
    Environ Int; 2004 Jul; 30(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 15051247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Life Cycle Assessments of a Conventional Green Building and a Net Zero Energy Building: Exploration of Static, Dynamic, Attributional, and Consequential Electricity Grid Models.
    Collinge WO; Rickenbacker HJ; Landis AE; Thiel CL; Bilec MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(19):11429-11438. PubMed ID: 30193455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soil biotreatment effectiveness for reducing global warming potential from main polluting tillage operations in life cycle assessment phase.
    Naujokienė V; Šarauskis E; Bleizgys R; Sasnauskienė J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 671():805-817. PubMed ID: 30947054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the impact assessment method on the conclusions of a LCA study. Application to the case of a part made with virgin and recycled HDPE.
    Simões CL; Xará SM; Bernardo CA
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1018-26. PubMed ID: 21558083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems.
    Suzer O
    J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():266-83. PubMed ID: 25745844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the benefits of commercial building energy codes and improving federal incentives for code adoption.
    Gilbraith N; Azevedo IL; Jaramillo P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14121-30. PubMed ID: 25383692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic Behavior in Certifying Green Buildings: An Inquiry of the Non-building Performance Value.
    Chiang Hsieh LH; Noonan D
    Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 28470397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of life cycle environmental benefits of an industrial symbiosis cluster in China.
    Yu F; Han F; Cui Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(7):5511-8. PubMed ID: 25339529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of low-impact-development (LID) technologies in southern Ontario.
    Bhatt A; Bradford A; Abbassi BE
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():98-109. PubMed ID: 30340137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies.
    Wender BA; Foley RW; Prado-Lopez V; Ravikumar D; Eisenberg DA; Hottle TA; Sadowski J; Flanagan WP; Fisher A; Laurin L; Bates ME; Linkov I; Seager TP; Fraser MP; Guston DH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10531-8. PubMed ID: 25121583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative life cycle assessment of material handling systems for sustainable mining.
    Erkayaoğlu M; Demirel N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 174():1-6. PubMed ID: 26986638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.