These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24484103)

  • 1. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Lee YY; Roberts CL; Patterson JA
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 24484103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Fielke RJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):84. PubMed ID: 24484102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
    Lee YY; Roberts CL; Patterson JA; Simpson JM; Nicholl MC; Morris JM; Ford JB
    Med J Aust; 2013 Sep; 199(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 23992192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals.
    Glantz JC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Apr; 24(4):636-42. PubMed ID: 20836744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nulliparous caesarean section in the home of active management of labour.
    How K; Foley M; Stronge J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 7771991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in caesarean and instrumental delivery rates in New Zealand hospitals.
    Johnson N; Ansell D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 7772003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Nair DB; Majoko F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713. PubMed ID: 26498306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Authors' reply re: Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Le Ray C; Blondel B; Prunet C; Khireddine I; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1713-4. PubMed ID: 26498305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rates of caesarean section and neonatal mortality.
    Taylor U; Zentay Z; Ganesh V; Apuzzio J; Murphy G; Iffy L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 32(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 1445126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Is the high frequency of Caesarean sections in a highly specialized gyneco-obstetric hospital justifiable?].
    Guzmán Ibarra Mde L; Ablanedo Aguirre J; Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA; Martínez Rodríguez OA; Ahumada Ramírez E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2003 Jun; 71():291-6. PubMed ID: 14515659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district.
    Rosenberg K; Hepburn M; McIlwaine G
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Oct; 89(10):787-92. PubMed ID: 7126498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of routinely collected data to assess maternal mortality in seven tertiary maternity centers in Cameroon.
    Mbassi SM; Mbu R; Bouvier-Colle MH
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 115(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 21930267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Greek economic crisis and impaired perinatal parameters: experience from a public maternity hospital.
    Sdona E; Papamichail D; Ragkou E; Briana DD; Malamitsi-Puchner A; Panagiotopoulos T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(18):2371-2375. PubMed ID: 28614961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital variation in maternal complications following caesarean delivery in the United States: 2006-2012.
    Moroz LA; Wright JD; Ananth CV; Friedman AM
    BJOG; 2016 Jun; 123(7):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26226828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [C-Section: little but enough information to put a stop to the inadequacy].
    Campillo Artero C
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 25028299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The outcome of delivery in the breech presentation at the Stara Zagora Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic during 1990-1992].
    Lazarov L; Todorov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 8651423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of ten years' experience of caesarean section at the maternity hospital Marika Iliadi, Athens.
    FOUCAS M; KARPOUSOGLOU J; GEORGIADES B
    Gynaecologia; 1955 Jul; 140(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 13251631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?
    Le Ray C; Blondel B; Prunet C; Khireddine I; Deneux-Tharaux C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):690-9. PubMed ID: 25412695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence and outcome of caesarean section in the private sector--3-year experience at Pretoria Gynaecological Hospital.
    Tshibangu KC; de Jongh MA; de Villiers DJ; du Toit JJ; Shah SM
    S Afr Med J; 2002 Dec; 92(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 12561407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the Robson classification has improved understanding of caesarean section rates in France.
    Vogel JP; Betrán AP; Gülmezoglu AM
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):700. PubMed ID: 25559493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.