These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24484112)

  • 1. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Wilkinson D; Casey MG; Eley DS
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 24484112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Casey M; Eley DS
    Med J Aust; 2014 Aug; 201(3):144. PubMed ID: 25128947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Behrendorff N; Liu D
    Med J Aust; 2014 Aug; 201(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 25128946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Arnold PC
    Med J Aust; 2014 Jun; 200(10):580. PubMed ID: 24882486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 14():31. PubMed ID: 24528509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.
    Sladek RM; Bond MJ; Frost LK; Prior KN
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27450570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors' experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?
    Kumar K; Roberts C; Bartle E; Eley DS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):533-546. PubMed ID: 29388087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selecting medical students for academic and attitudinal outcomes in a Catholic medical school.
    Quinlivan JA; Lam LT; Wan Sh; Petersen RW
    Med J Aust; 2010 Sep; 193(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 20854240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance.
    Wilkinson D; Zhang J; Byrne GJ; Luke H; Ozolins IZ; Parker MH; Peterson RF
    Med J Aust; 2008 Mar; 188(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 18341459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical communication skills learning outcomes among first year medical students are consistent irrespective of participation in an interview for admission to medical school.
    Casey M; Wilkinson D; Fitzgerald J; Eley D; Connor J
    Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):640-2. PubMed ID: 24796355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential influence of selection criteria on the demographic composition of students in an Australian medical school.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A; Carr SE; Louden W
    BMC Med Educ; 2011 Nov; 11():97. PubMed ID: 22111521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?
    Groves MA; Gordon J; Ryan G
    Med J Aust; 2007 Feb; 186(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 17309399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. James Cook University's rurally orientated medical school selection process: quality graduates and positive workforce outcomes.
    Ray RA; Woolley T; Sen Gupta T
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(4):3424. PubMed ID: 26442581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A longitudinal study of the impact of interviews on medical school admissions in Taiwan.
    Fan AP; Tsai TC; Su TP; Kosik RO; Morisky DE; Chen CH; Shih WJ; Lee CH
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Jun; 33(2):140-63. PubMed ID: 20356935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates' performance in 2014.
    Mercer A; Crotty B; Alldridge L; Le L; Vele V
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():31. PubMed ID: 25889535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT).
    Coates H
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):999-1006. PubMed ID: 18823519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equity in interviews: do personal characteristics impact on admission interview scores?
    Lumb AB; Homer M; Miller A
    Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 44(11):1077-83. PubMed ID: 20946478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An equivalence study of interview platform: Does videoconference technology impact medical school acceptance rates of different groups?
    Ballejos MP; Oglesbee S; Hettema J; Sapien R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):601-610. PubMed ID: 29445976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Longitudinal Study of Commonly Used Admissions Measures and Disenrollment from Medical School and Graduate Medical Education Probation or Termination from Training.
    Dong T; Gilliland WR; Cruess D; Hutchinson J; Morres L; Curtis J; Hewitt-Clarke GS; Durning SJ
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e680-e684. PubMed ID: 29718290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.