These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24484765)

  • 41. Environmental assessment of gas management options at the Old Ammässuo landfill (Finland) by means of LCA-modeling (EASEWASTE).
    Manfredi S; Niskanen A; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1588-94. PubMed ID: 19081238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system.
    De Feo G; Malvano C
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1901-15. PubMed ID: 19168344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion.
    Assamoi B; Lawryshyn Y
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):1019-30. PubMed ID: 22099926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Combining plasma gasification and solid oxide cell technologies in advanced power plants for waste to energy and electric energy storage applications.
    Perna A; Minutillo M; Lubrano Lavadera A; Jannelli E
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():424-438. PubMed ID: 28965703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of cross-media effects deriving from the application of lower emission standards for acid pollutants in waste-to-energy plants.
    Dal Pozzo A; Abagnato S; Cozzani V
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 2):159159. PubMed ID: 36191699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tools for evaluation of impact associated with MSW incineration: LCA and integrated environmental monitoring system.
    Morselli L; Bartoli M; Bertacchini M; Brighetti A; Luzi J; Passarini F; Masoni P
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 15737717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems.
    Liamsanguan C; Gheewala SH
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 17350748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: project overview and main results.
    Consonni S; Giugliano M; Massarutto A; Ragazzi M; Saccani C
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2057-65. PubMed ID: 21652196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Options for management of municipal solid waste in New York City: a preliminary comparison of health risks and policy implications.
    Moy P; Krishnan N; Ulloa P; Cohen S; Brandt-Rauf PW
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17379391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Life-cycle assessment of selected management options for air pollution control residues from waste incineration.
    Fruergaard T; Hyks J; Astrup T
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4672-80. PubMed ID: 20599249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Factors influencing the life cycle burdens of the recovery of energy from residual municipal waste.
    Burnley S; Coleman T; Peirce A
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():295-304. PubMed ID: 25758908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Techno-environmental analysis to valorize the secondary energy resources from refuse-derived fuel-based waste to energy plant.
    Patel H; Mssr T; Nandikes G; Pandey N; Bhattacharya D; Pathak P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(15):22441-22452. PubMed ID: 38407705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bury or burn North America MSW? LCAs provide answers for climate impacts & carbon neutral power potential.
    Morris J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(20):7944-9. PubMed ID: 20866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contribution of individual waste fractions to the environmental impacts from landfilling of municipal solid waste.
    Manfredi S; Tonini D; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 19854039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cogeneration from thermal treatment of selected municipal solid wastes. A stoichiometric model building for the case study on Palermo.
    Lo Mastro F; Mistretta M
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 15016419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment and comparison of the environmental performances of a regional incinerator network.
    Morselli L; Luzi J; De Robertis C; Vassura I; Carrillo V; Passarini F
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(8):S85-91. PubMed ID: 17416509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Environmental impact assessment of the incineration of municipal solid waste with auxiliary coal in China.
    Zhao Y; Xing W; Lu W; Zhang X; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1989-98. PubMed ID: 22683228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Projecting the environmental profile of Singapore's landfill activities: Comparisons of present and future scenarios based on LCA.
    Khoo HH; Tan LL; Tan RB
    Waste Manag; 2012 May; 32(5):890-900. PubMed ID: 22257698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Climate Change Impacts of Electricity Generated at a Waste-to-Energy Facility.
    Pfadt-Trilling AR; Volk TA; Fortier MP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 55(3):1436-1445. PubMed ID: 33417433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Valorisation and emerging perspective of biomass based waste-to-energy technologies and their socio-environmental impact: A review.
    Rasheed T; Anwar MT; Ahmad N; Sher F; Khan SU; Ahmad A; Khan R; Wazeer I
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112257. PubMed ID: 33690013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.