These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485053)

  • 1. An analytical method to calculate equivalent fields to irregular symmetric and asymmetric photon fields.
    Tahmasebi Birgani MJ; Chegeni N; Zabihzadeh M; Hamzian N
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24485053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and experimental evaluation of a simple analytical model for the TPR in the build-up region of megavoltage photon beams.
    Godin M; Galiano E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 22225295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalent squares of irregular photon fields.
    Tatcher M; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1229-32. PubMed ID: 8413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of small-field tissue phantom ratio data generation methods for an Elekta Agility 6 MV photon beam.
    Richmond N; Brackenridge R
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 24360920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose calculation for asymmetric photon fields with independent jaws and multileaf collimators.
    Araki F; Ikeda R; Moribe N; Shirakawa Y; Hatemura M; Shimonobou T; Hirata Y; Takada T; Takahashi M; Matoba M
    Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 10718137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical approach for determining beam profiles in water phantom of symmetric and asymmetric fields of wedged, blocked, and open photon beams.
    Tahmasebi Birgani MJ; Chegeni N; Arvandi S; Razmjoo Ghalaee S; Zabihzadeh M; Khezerloo D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4424. PubMed ID: 24257286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy limits of the equivalent field method for irregular photon fields.
    Sanz DE
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3073-85. PubMed ID: 12361211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculating percent depth dose with the electron pencil-beam redefinition algorithm.
    Price MJ; Hogstrom KR; Antolak JA; White RA; Bloch CD; Boyd RA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 8(2):61-75. PubMed ID: 17592466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analytical representation of equivalent square field size in relation to surface dose.
    Butson MJ; Mathur JN; Metcalfe PE
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):194-6. PubMed ID: 8936729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical representation of enhanced dynamic wedge factors for symmetric and asymmetric photon fields.
    Yu MK
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2606-10. PubMed ID: 12462727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of parameters for a multiple-source model of megavoltage photon beams using optimization methods.
    Tillikainen L; Siljamäki S; Helminen H; Alakuijala J; Pyyry J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1441-67. PubMed ID: 17301464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry for asymmetric x-ray fields.
    Kwa W; Kornelsen RO; Harrison RW; el-Khatib E
    Med Phys; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1599-604. PubMed ID: 7869992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: Determining equivalent squares of high-energetic photon fields.
    Ringholz J; Wegener S; Sauer OA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1242-1250. PubMed ID: 36289176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
    Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of primary off-axis ratios in wedged asymmetric photon fields: a formalism for dose and monitor unit calculations.
    Mihailidis DN; Tomara PD; Gibbons JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2003-14. PubMed ID: 15843733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative output factors of asymmetric megavoltage beams.
    Tenhunen M; Lahtinen T
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Sep; 32(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7816941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose calculations for asymmetric fields defined by independent collimators using symmetric field data.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Xenofos S; Papalexopoulos A; Nikoletopoulos S
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):403-9. PubMed ID: 10844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.