158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485512)
1. Patellar mechanics during simulated kneeling in the natural and implanted knee.
Abo-Alhol TR; Fitzpatrick CK; Clary CW; Cyr AJ; Maletsky LP; Laz PJ; Rullkoetter PJ
J Biomech; 2014 Mar; 47(5):1045-51. PubMed ID: 24485512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo comparison of medialized dome and anatomic patellofemoral geometries using subject-specific computational modeling.
Ali AA; Mannen EM; Rullkoetter PJ; Shelburne KB
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1910-1918. PubMed ID: 29411900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Component Geometry on Patellar Mechanics in Posterior-Stabilized Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Mannen EM; Ali AA; Dennis DA; Haas BD; Rullkoetter PJ; Shelburne KB
J Arthroplasty; 2019 May; 34(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 30777625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effects of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty.
Wilkens KJ; Duong LV; McGarry MH; Kim WC; Lee TQ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Dec; 89(12):2745-51. PubMed ID: 18056508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In Vivo Three-Dimensional Patellar Mechanics: Normal Knees Compared with Domed and Anatomic Patellar Components.
Sharma A; Grieco TF; Zingde SM; Dennis DA; Anderle MR; Komistek RD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Mar; 99(5):e18. PubMed ID: 28244917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation.
Huang CH; Hsu LI; Lin KJ; Chang TK; Cheng CK; Lu YC; Chen CS; Huang CH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Dec; 22(12):3047-53. PubMed ID: 24384946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of patellar bone strain in the natural and implanted knee during simulated deep flexion.
Fitzpatrick CK; Baldwin MA; Ali AA; Laz PJ; Rullkoetter PJ
J Orthop Res; 2011 Feb; 29(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 20830739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of patellar implantation on the patellofemoral joint of an anatomic customised total knee replacement implant: A case study.
Wang L; Wang CJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Dec; 234(12):1370-1383. PubMed ID: 32723134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medialized Dome and Anatomic Onlay Patella Designs in the Modern Posterior Stabilized Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrate No Clinical or Radiological Differences at One Year.
Sobhi S; Finsterwald MA; Häckel S; Holzer LA; Yates PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Jan; 39(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 37321517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty reproduces natural patellofemoral joint kinematics when the patella is resurfaced.
Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Vander Sloten J; Desloovere K; Bellemans J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3668-3677. PubMed ID: 25381467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patella height influences patellofemoral contact and kinematics following cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.
Tischer T; Geier A; Lutter C; Enz A; Bader R; Kebbach M
J Orthop Res; 2023 Apr; 41(4):793-802. PubMed ID: 35949157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying alignment parameters affecting implanted patellofemoral mechanics.
Fitzpatrick CK; Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Wright A; Laz PJ; Rullkoetter PJ
J Orthop Res; 2012 Jul; 30(7):1167-75. PubMed ID: 22570224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved postoperative kneeling ability in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with medialized dome-patella resurfacing: A retrospective comparative outcome analysis.
Häckel S; Haldemann L; Finsterwald M; Yates P
J ISAKOS; 2024 Apr; 9(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 38159866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of patellofemoral overstuffing on knee flexion and patellar kinematics following total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
Bracey DN; Brown ML; Beard HR; Mannava S; Nazir OF; Seyler TM; Lang JE
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25776464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Patellar Kinematics and Patellofemoral Pressure.
Tanikawa H; Tada M; Harato K; Okuma K; Nagura T
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):280-285. PubMed ID: 27480826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.
Chew JT; Stewart NJ; Hanssen AD; Luo ZP; Rand JA; An KN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):87-98. PubMed ID: 9418625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superior-inferior position of patellar component affects patellofemoral kinematics and contact forces in computer simulation.
Nakamura S; Tanaka Y; Kuriyama S; Nishitani K; Ito H; Furu M; Matsuda S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jun; 45():19-24. PubMed ID: 28437676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.
Baldwin MA; Clary C; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2341-8. PubMed ID: 19720376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D in vivo femoro-tibial kinematics of tri-condylar total knee arthroplasty during kneeling activities.
Nakamura S; Sharma A; Kobayashi M; Ito H; Nakamura K; Zingde SM; Nakamura T; Komistek RD
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 24055271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computational framework for population-based evaluation of TKR-implanted patellofemoral joint mechanics.
Ali AA; Clary CW; Smoger LM; Dennis DA; Fitzpatrick CK; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 32020408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
