150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485729)
1. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.
Grünheid T; Patel N; De Felippe NL; Wey A; Gaillard PR; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 24485729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
Abizadeh N; Moles DR; O'Neill J; Noar JH
J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models.
Luu NS; Mandich MA; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 23590668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.
Quimby ML; Vig KW; Rashid RG; Firestone AR
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 15264638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
Jedlińska A
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models.
Veenema AC; Katsaros C; Boxum SC; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 19329650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
