242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485735)
1. Impact of metal and ceramic fixed orthodontic appliances on judgments of beauty and other face-related attributes.
Fonseca LM; Araújo TM; Santos AR; Faber J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 24485735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances.
Rosvall MD; Fields HW; Ziuchkovski J; Rosenstiel SF; Johnston WM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):276.e1-12; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 19268820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Social perceptions of adults wearing orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional study.
Jeremiah HG; Bister D; Newton JT
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 20651044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents.
Walton DK; Fields HW; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF; Firestone AR; Christensen JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):698.e1-12; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 21130314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of esthetic brackets' resistance to torsional forces from the archwire.
Nishio C; Mendes Ade M; Almeida MA; Tanaka E; Tanne K; Elias CN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19121499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Esthetic effect of orthodontic appliances on a smiling face with and without a missing maxillary first premolar.
Berto PM; Lima CS; Lenza MA; Faber J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S55-60. PubMed ID: 19362267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness.
Ziuchkovski JP; Fields HW; Johnston WM; Lindsey DT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S68-78. PubMed ID: 18407023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of visible dental caries on social judgements and overall facial attractiveness amongst undergraduates.
Karunakaran T; Gilbert D; Asimakopoulou K; Newton T
J Dent; 2011 Mar; 39(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 21211545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Fleming PS; Dibiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 19123718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metal ion release from fixed orthodontic appliances--an in vivo study.
Amini F; Jafari A; Amini P; Sepasi S
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 21303810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
Thorstenson G; Kusy R
Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptability and attractiveness of intra- and extra-oral orthodontic appliances.
Abu Alhaija ES; Karajeh MA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 23729132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs to feldspathic porcelains.
Samruajbenjakul B; Kukiattrakoon B
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 19413398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of chewing gum on the impact, pain and breakages associated with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized clinical trial.
Benson PE; Razi RM; Al-Bloushi RJ
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Aug; 15(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 22812440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sliding resistance of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets and stainless steel esthetic archwires.
Hiroce M; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN; Miguel JA
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23021118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating.
Demling A; Elter C; Heidenblut T; Bach FW; Hahn A; Schwestka-Polly R; Stiesch M; Heuer W
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 20139131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occlusal bite force changes during 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
Alomari SA; Alhaija ES
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 23304968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
