128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485743)
1. Introduction to observational studies: part 2.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of observational studies.
Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 25432264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-sectional studies.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 24975008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias in observational studies.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):542-3. PubMed ID: 24703294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing?
Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
Vandenbroucke JP
Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1728-31. PubMed ID: 15158638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons in biostatistics: inferences and conjectures about average and conditional treatment effects in randomized trials and observational studies.
Bottai M
J Intern Med; 2014 Sep; 276(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 25040872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why randomized interventional studies.
La Caze A
J Med Philos; 2013 Aug; 38(4):352-68. PubMed ID: 23856475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
Pandis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 21320892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
Yue LQ
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
