120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485859)
1. How diabetes risk assessment tools are implemented in practice: a systematic review.
Dhippayom T; Chaiyakunapruk N; Krass I
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2014 Jun; 104(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 24485859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review.
Noble D; Mathur R; Dent T; Meads C; Greenhalgh T
BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7163. PubMed ID: 22123912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.
Rubin KH; Friis-Holmberg T; Hermann AP; Abrahamsen B; Brixen K
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1701-17. PubMed ID: 23592255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents: attitudes, barriers, and practices among pediatric clinicians.
Rhodes ET; Finkelstein JA; Marshall R; Allen C; Gillman MW; Ludwig DS
Ambul Pediatr; 2006; 6(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 16530149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes about oral anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation: a qualitative systematic review.
Mas Dalmau G; Sant Arderiu E; Enfedaque Montes MB; Solà I; Pequeño Saco S; Alonso Coello P
BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 28086887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tools for predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes in daily practice.
Schwarz PE; Li J; Lindstrom J; Tuomilehto J
Horm Metab Res; 2009 Feb; 41(2):86-97. PubMed ID: 19021089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Barriers to insulin progression among patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
Polinski JM; Smith BF; Curtis BH; Seeger JD; Choudhry NK; Connolly JG; Shrank WH
Diabetes Educ; 2013; 39(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 23192599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment tools for detecting those with pre-diabetes: a systematic review.
Barber SR; Davies MJ; Khunti K; Gray LJ
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2014 Jul; 105(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 24694663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different type 2 diabetes risk assessments predict dissimilar numbers at 'high risk': a retrospective analysis of diabetes risk-assessment tools.
Gray BJ; Bracken RM; Turner D; Morgan K; Thomas M; Williams SP; Williams M; Rice S; Stephens JW;
Br J Gen Pract; 2015 Dec; 65(641):e852-60. PubMed ID: 26541180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the severity of Type 2 diabetes using clinical data-based measures: a systematic review.
Zghebi SS; Panagioti M; Rutter MK; Ashcroft DM; van Marwijk H; Salisbury C; Chew-Graham CA; Buchan I; Qureshi N; Peek N; Mallen C; Mamas M; Kontopantelis E
Diabet Med; 2019 Jun; 36(6):688-701. PubMed ID: 30672017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Membership in a diabetes-care network and adherence to clinical practice guidelines for treating type 2 diabetes among general practitioners: A four-year follow-up.
Casanova L; Bocquier A; Cortaredona S; Nauleau S; Sauze L; Sciortino V; Villani P; Verger P
Prim Care Diabetes; 2016 Oct; 10(5):342-51. PubMed ID: 27483997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge of a Diabetes Risk Score Does Not Alter Diabetes Screening Practice in a Seniors Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Law V; Featherstone T; Eurich DT; Simpson SH
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1021-1023. PubMed ID: 30049541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding type 2 diabetes mellitus screening practices among primary care physicians: a qualitative chart-stimulated recall study.
Hafez D; Nelson DB; Martin EG; Cohen AJ; Northway R; Kullgren JT
BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28376802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of screening for type 2 diabetes in high-risk patients: a systematic review.
Rao G
J Fam Pract; 1999 Oct; 48(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 12224679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with mental illness: application of a self-assessment score for diabetes mellitus risk.
Shin JK; Shortridge-Baggett LM; Sachmechi I; Barron C; Chiu YL; Bajracharya B; Bang H
Psychiatry Res; 2014 Dec; 220(3):1037-42. PubMed ID: 25223258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canadian Primary Care Physicians' Attitudes Toward Understanding Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Screening.
Alexander PE; Li SA; Tonelli M; Guyatt G
Can J Diabetes; 2016 Dec; 40(6):580-585. PubMed ID: 27590082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Type-2 diabetes primary prevention program implemented in routine primary care: a process evaluation study.
Sánchez A; Silvestre C; Campo N; Grandes G;
Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):254. PubMed ID: 27206733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of response rates and yields for Two opportunistic Tools for Early detection of Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and Diabetes (ATTEND). A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Khunti K; Gillies CL; Dallosso H; Brady EM; Gray LJ; Kilgallen G; Willis A; Zafar A; Davies MJ
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2016 Aug; 118():12-20. PubMed ID: 27485852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Issues that impact type-2 diabetes self-management in rural communities.
Ross S; Benavides-Vaello S; Schumann L; Haberman M
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2015 Nov; 27(11):653-60. PubMed ID: 25776183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Confusion among medical doctors caused by multiple international criteria.
Agarwal MM; Shah SM; Al Kaabi J; Saquib S; Othman Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jun; 41(6):861-9. PubMed ID: 25546555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
