These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24485865)

  • 1. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
    van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical shape and appearance models for fast and automated estimation of proximal femur fracture load using 2D finite element models.
    Sarkalkan N; Waarsing JH; Bos PK; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):3107-14. PubMed ID: 25052137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
    Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
    Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
    Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load.
    Keyak JH; Falkinstein Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Nov; 25(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 14519351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.
    Keyak JH
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Apr; 23(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11410381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation.
    Hambli R; Allaoui S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2515-27. PubMed ID: 23864338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of Hip Failure Load: In Vitro Study of 80 Femurs Using Three Imaging Methods and Finite Element Models-The European Fracture Study (EFFECT).
    Pottecher P; Engelke K; Duchemin L; Museyko O; Moser T; Mitton D; Vicaut E; Adams J; Skalli W; Laredo JD; Bousson V
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 27077380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
    Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
    Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
    Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating in vivo fall assessments in the simulation of femoral fractures with finite element models.
    van der Zijden AM; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Groen BE; Nienhuis B; Weerdesteyn V; Tanck E
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jun; 37(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 25892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
    Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurements.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):802-806. PubMed ID: 26944687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.
    Keyak JH; Rossi SA; Jones KA; Skinner HB
    J Biomech; 1998 Feb; 31(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 9593205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.