These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24486123)

  • 1. Midline versus transverse incision for cesarean delivery in low-income countries.
    Maaløe N; Aabakke AJ; Secher NJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Apr; 125(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24486123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative safety of the low transverse versus the low vertical uterine incision for cesarean delivery of breech infants.
    Schutterman EB; Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 May; 61(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 6835613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine incision-to-delivery interval and perinatal outcomes in transverse versus vertical incisions in preterm cesarean deliveries.
    Luthra G; Gawade P; Starikov R; Markenson G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 26(18):1788-91. PubMed ID: 23834536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fetal outcome following cesarean section in premature labor. Isthmocorpus longitudinal section or isthmian transverse section?].
    Dietl J; Dannecker G; Goretzki K; Hirsch HA
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Jan; 48(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 3350321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine incision and maternal morbidity after cesarean section for delivery of the very low birthweight fetus.
    Druzin ML; Hutson JM; San Roman G
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Aug; 169(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 2756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision during cesarean delivery.
    Xodo S; Saccone G; Cromi A; Ozcan P; Spagnolo E; Berghella V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():75-80. PubMed ID: 27180273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transverse versus longitudinal uterine incision in cesarean delivery of triplets.
    Mordel N; Ezra Y; Benshushan A; Dorembus D; Schenker JG; Sadovsky E
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Sep; 38(9):695-6. PubMed ID: 8254591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study.
    Althabe F; Sosa C; Belizán JM; Gibbons L; Jacquerioz F; Bergel E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 17150064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mode and timing of twin delivery and perinatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis of the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.
    Ganchimeg T; Morisaki N; Vogel JP; Cecatti JG; Barrett J; Jayaratne K; Mittal S; Ortiz-Panozo E; Souza JP; Crowther C; Ota E; Mori R;
    BJOG; 2014 Mar; 121 Suppl 1():89-100. PubMed ID: 24641539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Just do like us ... about the dispersion of 'evidence' from high-income countries to settings with limited resources.
    Hoj L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):927-8. PubMed ID: 16167905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing of antibiotic administration and infectious morbidity following cesarean delivery: incorporating policy change into workflow.
    Young BC; Hacker MR; Dodge LE; Golen TH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1219-24. PubMed ID: 22068752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Caesarean section: low transverse (pfannenstiel) or midline incision? (author's transl)].
    Hetzel H; Bichler A; Geir W; Dapunt O
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1979 Apr; 183(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 35886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transverse fundal uterine incision for delivery of extremely low birth-weight infants.
    Taga A; Kondoh E; Hamanishi J; Kawasaki K; Fujita K; Mogami H; Konishi I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 27(12):1285-7. PubMed ID: 24111613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?
    Chauhan SP; Roach H; Naef RW; Magann EF; Morrison JC; Martin JN
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 9219122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice of abdominal incision and risk of trauma to the urinary bladder and bowel in multiple cesarean sections.
    Makoha FW; Fathuddien MA; Felimban HM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 16029923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time between skin incision and delivery during cesarean.
    Rossouw JN; Hall D; Harvey J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 23340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean.
    Nabhan AF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17904561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mode of delivery for periviable birth.
    Mercer BM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Dec; 37(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 24290399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Original Suprapannicular Incision Technique for Cesarean Delivery in the Morbidly Obese Parturient.
    Lakhi NA; Williamson K; Moretti ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):619-623. PubMed ID: 30095785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The risks for fetus and mother depending on the type of cesarean section].
    Atanasov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1991; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1793129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.