These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24486535)

  • 1. MAUDE: analysis of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.
    Manoucheri E; Fuchs-Weizman N; Cohen SL; Wang KC; Einarsson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):592-5. PubMed ID: 24486535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Classification Scheme for Examining Adverse Events Associated with Medical Devices, Specifically the DaVinci Surgical System as Reported in the FDA MAUDE Database.
    Gupta P; Schomburg J; Krishna S; Adejoro O; Wang Q; Marsh B; Nguyen A; Genere JR; Self P; Lund E; Konety BR
    J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27806637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic Urologic Surgery: Trends in Food and Drug Administration-Reported Adverse Events Over the Last Decade.
    Nik-Ahd F; Souders CP; Houman J; Zhao H; Chughtai B; Anger JT
    J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):649-654. PubMed ID: 31037961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malfunction Events in the US FDA MAUDE Database: How Does Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Compare with Other Specialties?
    Correa J; Aribo C; Stuparich M; Nahas S; Cheung C; Behbehani S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):300-307.e1. PubMed ID: 34464761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient injuries and malfunctions associated with robotic prostatectomy: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience database.
    Pierce H; Roberts B; Scherr D; Barbieri C; Anger J; McClure T; Chughtai B
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 32385798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysteroscopic morcellation: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database.
    Haber K; Hawkins E; Levie M; Chudnoff S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 25128851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic sacrocolpopexy: adverse events reported to the FDA over the last decade.
    Souders C; Nik-Ahd F; Zhao H; Eilber K; Chugtai B; Anger J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1919-1923. PubMed ID: 30617505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA.
    Fuller J; Ashar BS; Carey-Corrado J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 16036187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
    Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bowel injury in robotic gynecologic surgery: risk factors and management options. A systematic review.
    Picerno T; Sloan NL; Escobar P; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 27640938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications.
    Cooper MA; Ibrahim A; Lyu H; Makary MA
    J Healthc Qual; 2015; 37(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 23980819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse event reporting in head and neck transoral robotic surgery: a MAUDE database study.
    Assam JH; DeHaan MC; Bakken S; Spanos WC
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Dec; 15(6):899-904. PubMed ID: 33484416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Global robotic experience and the type of surgical system impact the types of robotic malfunctions and their clinical consequences: an FDA MAUDE review.
    Lucas SM; Pattison EA; Sundaram CP
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(8):1222-7; discussion 1227. PubMed ID: 22044556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.
    Alemzadeh H; Raman J; Leveson N; Kalbarczyk Z; Iyer RK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0151470. PubMed ID: 27097160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to the MAUDE database.
    Gurtcheff SE
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 18303506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh.
    Sandberg JM; Gray I; Pearlman A; Terlecki RP
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29520389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endometrial ablation devices: review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database.
    Della Badia C; Nyirjesy P; Atogho A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 17630160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.