311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24486680)
1. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Mar; 44(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 29239059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecological Malignancies: Comparison with a Laparoscopic Approach.
Lee HJ; Lee YH; Chong GO; Hong DG; Lee YS
Anticancer Res; 2017 Dec; 37(12):7087-7093. PubMed ID: 29187500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy With Double Docking: Technique, Learning Curve, and Perioperative Outcomes.
Ponce J; Barahona M; Pla MJ; Rovira J; Garcia-Tejedor A; Gil-Ibanez B; Gaspar HM; Sabria E; Bartolomé C; Marti L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 26898894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprehensive Staging of Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using a Multiquadrant Robotic Platform.
Dellinger TH; Wakabayashi MT; Han ES
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):531-532. PubMed ID: 27794476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Correa-Paris A; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera S; de la Torre J; Centeno C; Puig OP; Gil-Ibañez B; Colas E; Magrina J; Gil-Moreno A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2966-74. PubMed ID: 27098143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-Site Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging Surgery for Presumed Clinically Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Yoo JG; Kim WJ; Lee KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):380-381. PubMed ID: 28911827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
Krause AK; Muntz HG; McGonigle KF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
