These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487209)
1. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments. Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variable Selection for Confounding Adjustment in High-dimensional Covariate Spaces When Analyzing Healthcare Databases. Schneeweiss S; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Patorno E; Rassen J; Franklin JM Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 27779497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation. Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan M; Lendle SD; Ju C; Franklin JM Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 28991001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses. Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders. Arbogast PG; Ray WA Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent. Desai RJ; Rothman KJ; Bateman BT; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 27922533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An application of propensity score matching using claims data. Seeger JD; Williams PL; Walker AM Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):465-76. PubMed ID: 15651087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm. Schuster T; Pang M; Platt RW Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1004-7. PubMed ID: 25866189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study. Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extension of Disease Risk Score-Based Confounding Adjustments for Multiple Outcomes of Interest: An Empirical Evaluation. Desai RJ; Wyss R; Jin Y; Bohn J; Toh S; Cosgrove A; Kennedy A; Kim J; Kim C; Ouellet-Hellstrom R; Karami S; Major JM; Niman A; Wang SV; Gagne JJ Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 187(11):2439-2448. PubMed ID: 29947726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using high-dimensional propensity scores to automate confounding control in a distributed medical product safety surveillance system. Rassen JA; Schneeweiss S Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21 Suppl 1():41-9. PubMed ID: 22262592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Heinze G; Jüni P Eur Heart J; 2011 Jul; 32(14):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21362706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity score adjustment for pretreatment differences between hospitalized and ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators. Stone RA; Obrosky DS; Singer DE; Kapoor WN; Fine MJ Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4 Suppl):AS56-66. PubMed ID: 7723462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of high-dimensional confounder summary scores in comparative studies of newly marketed medications. Kumamaru H; Gagne JJ; Glynn RJ; Setoguchi S; Schneeweiss S J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():200-8. PubMed ID: 26931292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining Super Learner with high-dimensional propensity score to improve confounding adjustment: A real-world application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dhopeshwarkar N; Yang W; Hennessy S; Rhodes JM; Cuker A; Leonard CE Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e5678. PubMed ID: 37609668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research. Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bias reduction in repeated-measures observational studies by the use of propensity score: the case of enteral sedation for critically ill patients. Umbrello M; Mistraletti G; Corbella D; Cigada M; Salini S; Morabito A; Iapichino G J Crit Care; 2012 Dec; 27(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 22884533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods. Guertin JR; Rahme E; Dormuth CR; LeLorier J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():22. PubMed ID: 26891796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]