These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487209)

  • 21. High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.
    Schneeweiss S; Rassen JA; Glynn RJ; Avorn J; Mogun H; Brookhart MA
    Epidemiology; 2009 Jul; 20(4):512-22. PubMed ID: 19487948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of propensity score technique to account for exposure-related covariates: an example and lesson.
    Seeger JD; Kurth T; Walker AM
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S143-8. PubMed ID: 17909373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.
    Zhu Y; Schonbach M; Coffman DL; Williams JS
    Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):e14-5. PubMed ID: 25643109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.
    Galadima HI; McClish DK
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):568-582. PubMed ID: 31111682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples.
    Rassen JA; Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 173(12):1404-13. PubMed ID: 21602301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Targeting Uric Acid and the Inhibition of Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease--A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Uchida S; Chang WX; Ota T; Tamura Y; Shiraishi T; Kumagai T; Shibata S; Fujigaki Y; Hosoyamada M; Kaneko K; Shen ZY; Fujimori S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145506. PubMed ID: 26700005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of a propensity score approach for risk adjustment in profiling multiple physician groups on asthma care.
    Huang IC; Frangakis C; Dominici F; Diette GB; Wu AW
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):253-78. PubMed ID: 15663712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: use of propensity-score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias.
    Suh HS; Hay JW; Johnson KA; Doctor JN
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21(5):470-84. PubMed ID: 22461130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.
    Garbe E; Kloss S; Suling M; Pigeot I; Schneeweiss S
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 69(3):549-57. PubMed ID: 22763756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 18471657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Matching Weights to Simultaneously Compare Three Treatment Groups: Comparison to Three-way Matching.
    Yoshida K; Hernández-Díaz S; Solomon DH; Jackson JW; Gagne JJ; Glynn RJ; Franklin JM
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28151746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments.
    Tian Y; Schuemie MJ; Suchard MA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 47(6):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 29939268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.