These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487209)
41. Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments. Tian Y; Schuemie MJ; Suchard MA Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 47(6):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 29939268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration. Stürmer T; Schneeweiss S; Avorn J; Glynn RJ Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 15987725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation on morbidity and mortality: a nationwide cohort study and propensity score analysis. Chang CH; Lin JW; Chiu FC; Caffrey JL; Wu LC; Lai MS Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 24446025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluating the impact of unmeasured confounding with internal validation data: an example cost evaluation in type 2 diabetes. Faries D; Peng X; Pawaskar M; Price K; Stamey JD; Seaman JW Value Health; 2013; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23538177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Balance measures for propensity score methods: a clinical example on beta-agonist use and the risk of myocardial infarction. Groenwold RH; de Vries F; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Rutten FH; Hoes AW; Klungel OH Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21953948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Supplementary data collection with case-cohort analysis to address potential confounding in a cohort study of thromboembolism in oral contraceptive initiators matched on claims-based propensity scores. Eng PM; Seeger JD; Loughlin J; Clifford CR; Mentor S; Walker AM Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Mar; 17(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 18215000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Risk of ischemic cerebrovascular and coronary events in adult users of anticonvulsant medications in routine care settings. Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernandez-Diaz S; Avorn J; Wahl PM; Bohn RL; Mines D; Liu J; Schneeweiss S J Am Heart Assoc; 2013 Jul; 2(4):e000208. PubMed ID: 23900213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods. Martens EP; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Stricker BH; Klungel OH Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jan; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17960554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Confronting "confounding by health system use" in Medicare Part D: comparative effectiveness of propensity score approaches to confounding adjustment. Polinski JM; Schneeweiss S; Glynn RJ; Lii J; Rassen JA Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):90-8. PubMed ID: 22552984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates. Loux TM Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records. Toh S; García Rodríguez LA; Hernán MA Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Aug; 20(8):849-57. PubMed ID: 21717528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Adjustment for missing confounders in studies based on observational databases: 2-stage calibration combining propensity scores from primary and validation data. Lin HW; Chen YH Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 180(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 24966224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Misuse of Regression Adjustment for Additional Confounders Following Insufficient Propensity Score Balancing. Shinozaki T; Nojima M Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):541-548. PubMed ID: 31166216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel. Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes. Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Variance estimation for stratified propensity score estimators. Williamson EJ; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter JR Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1617-32. PubMed ID: 22362427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Are associations between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and body mass index or waist circumference based on model extrapolations? Leal C; Bean K; Thomas F; Chaix B Epidemiology; 2011 Sep; 22(5):694-703. PubMed ID: 21709560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The added value of propensity score matching when using health-related quality of life reference data. Cottone F; Efficace F; Apolone G; Collins GS Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5119-32. PubMed ID: 23740803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation. Kabata D; Stuart EA; Shintani A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):228. PubMed ID: 39363252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]