243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487465)
1. Architectural versus nuclear atypia-defined FIGO grade 2 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEC): a clinicopathologic comparison of 154 cases with clinical follow-up.
Winham WM; Lin D; Stone PJ; Nucci MR; Quick CM
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Mar; 33(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 24487465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low-grade, low-stage endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 324 cases focusing on frequency and pattern of myoinvasion.
Quick CM; May T; Horowitz NS; Nucci MR
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Jul; 31(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 22653347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading.
Sagae S; Saito T; Satoh M; Ikeda T; Kimura S; Mori M; Sato N; Kudo R
Oncology; 2004; 67(5-6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15713989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns of recurrence in 1988 FIGO stage IC endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Long KC; Zhou Q; Hensley ML; Alektiar KM; Gomez J; Gardner GJ; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 22112609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factor analysis of recurrence in low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Roma AA; Rybicki LA; Barbuto D; Euscher E; Djordjevic B; Frauenhoffer E; Kim I; Hong SR; Montiel D; Ali-Fehmi R; Malpica A; Silva EG
Hum Pathol; 2015 Oct; 46(10):1529-39. PubMed ID: 26264257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Kurman RJ; Diana KL; Morrow CP
Cancer; 1995 Jan; 75(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7804981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphovascular space invasion does not predict vaginal relapses in stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.
Desrosiers L; Fadare O; Xiao ZF; Dresser K; Wang SA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Apr; 12(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18325471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intravaginal brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Alektiar KM; Venkatraman E; Chi DS; Barakat RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15850910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in endometrioid endometrial cancer stages IA and IB.
Han KH; Kim HS; Lee M; Chung HH; Song YS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 May; 96(21):e6976. PubMed ID: 28538399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular profile of grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: is it a type I or type II endometrial carcinoma?
Alvarez T; Miller E; Duska L; Oliva E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 May; 36(5):753-61. PubMed ID: 22498825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of solid growth in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Akar S; Çelik ZE; Fındık S; İlhan TT; Ercan F; Çelik Ç
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 31452018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prognostic value of nuclear grading and the revised FIGO grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Ayhan A; Taskiran C; Yuce K; Kucukali T
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jan; 22(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 12496701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia.
Ip PP; Irving JA; McCluggage WG; Clement PB; Young RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 23211295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparison of the agreement in determining the histological grade of uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, using the three-grade FIGO classification and the two-grade system.
Demczuk S; Wierzchowski W; Szczepański W; Dyduch G; Czopek J; Stachura J
Pol J Pathol; 2003; 54(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 14703284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.
Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; Mychalczak BR; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 12124832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
