These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487638)

  • 1. Waste not, want not.
    Rockman HA
    J Clin Invest; 2014 Feb; 124(2):463. PubMed ID: 24487638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
    Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are you a budding academic writer?
    Grant MJ; Bonnett P; Sutton A; Marshall A; Murphy J; Spring H
    Health Info Libr J; 2016 Mar; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
    Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
    Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sharing Your Practice Expertise: Writing Clinical Manuscripts for Publication.
    McGrath JM; Brandon D
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Aug; 15(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 26225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
    Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
    Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does "Decision Fatigue" Impact Manuscript Acceptance? An Analysis of Editorial Decisions by the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
    Kwan J; Stein L; Delshad S; Johl S; Park H; Martinez B; Topp L; Spiegel BM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 111(11):1511-1512. PubMed ID: 27725653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Let's talk about Reviewer Rewards.
    Jackson S
    J Clin Invest; 2019 Feb; 129(2):439. PubMed ID: 30601763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the quality of the peer review process: author and editorial board member perspectives.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Oct; 40(8):701-4. PubMed ID: 23021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts: A gender-based approach from a public health journal.
    Felícitas Domínguez-Berjón M; Godoy P; Ruano-Ravina A; Negrín MÁ; Vives-Cases C; Álvarez-Dardet C; Bermúdez-Tamayo C; López MJ; Pérez G; Borrell C
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):94-108. PubMed ID: 29390914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
    Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
    Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance and rejection of manuscripts for publication in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
    DiPiro JT
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2013 May; 77(4):66. PubMed ID: 23716734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion.
    Dickersin K; Ssemanda E; Mansell C; Rennie D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Sep; 7():44. PubMed ID: 17894854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.