These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487665)
1. PEEK rod systems for the spine. Mavrogenis AF; Vottis C; Triantafyllopoulos G; Papagelopoulos PJ; Pneumaticos SG Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():S111-6. PubMed ID: 24487665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs. Gornet MF; Chan FW; Coleman JC; Murrell B; Nockels RP; Taylor BA; Lanman TH; Ochoa JA J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081009. PubMed ID: 21950902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the biomechanical effect of pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: a study using finite element analysis. Jahng TA; Kim YE; Moon KY Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 23266148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: a preliminary report. Qi L; Li M; Zhang S; Xue J; Si H Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Jul; 155(7):1187-93. PubMed ID: 23708088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spinal motion and intradiscal pressure measurements before and after lumbar spine instrumentation with titanium or PEEK rods. Abode-Iyamah K; Kim SB; Grosland N; Kumar R; Belirgen M; Lim TH; Torner J; Hitchon PW J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 21(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 24314848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Rods in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: A Case Series. Ormond DR; Albert L; Das K Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(7):E371-5. PubMed ID: 23075859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and biomechanical researches of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for semi-rigid lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Li C; Liu L; Shi JY; Yan KZ; Shen WZ; Yang ZR Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Apr; 41(2):375-389. PubMed ID: 27392677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Ponnappan RK; Serhan H; Zarda B; Patel R; Albert T; Vaccaro AR Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 18838341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjacent-Level Hypermobility and Instrumented-Level Fatigue Loosening With Titanium and PEEK Rods for a Pedicle Screw System: An In Vitro Study. Agarwal A; Ingels M; Kodigudla M; Momeni N; Goel V; Agarwal AK J Biomech Eng; 2016 May; 138(5):051004. PubMed ID: 26974289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of nonlinearity in the materials used for the semi-rigid pedicle screw systems on biomechanical behaviors of the lumbar spine after surgery. Kim H; Lim DH; Oh HJ; Lee KY; Lee SJ Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 6(5):055005. PubMed ID: 21849724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in cervical fusion in a new sheep model. Wu J; Shi L; Pei Y; Yang D; Gao P; Xiao X; Guo S; Li M; Li X; Guo Z Eur Spine J; 2020 May; 29(5):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 32008100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Turner JL; Paller DJ; Murrell CB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):E1076-82. PubMed ID: 20838271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experiences with a PEEK-based dynamic instrumentation device in lumbar spinal surgery: 2 years and no more. Oikonomidis S; Ashqar G; Kaulhausen T; Herren C; Siewe J; Sobottke R J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Aug; 13(1):196. PubMed ID: 30092790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Cho DY; Lee WY; Sheu PC Surg Neurol; 2004 Nov; 62(5):378-85, discussion 385-6. PubMed ID: 15518835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model. Oikonomidis S; Greven J; Bredow J; Eh M; Prescher A; Fischer H; Thüring J; Eysel P; Hildebrand F; Kobbe P; Scheyerer MJ; Herren C Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105153. PubMed ID: 32829232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws reduce artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with lumbar spondylodesis. Fleege C; Makowski M; Rauschmann M; Fraunhoffer KL; Fennema P; Arabmotlagh M; Rickert M Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):16094. PubMed ID: 32999385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of rigid, semi-rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices: A finite element study. Biswas JK; Roy S; Rana M; Halder S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Dec; 233(12):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31608769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]