234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24487727)
1. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
Freitas AL; Clark SL
Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
Weissman DH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control.
Feldman JL; Clark SL; Freitas AL
Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():132-40. PubMed ID: 26003915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normal cognitive conflict resolution in psychosis patients with and without schizophrenia.
Smid HGOM; Bruggeman R; Martens S
J Abnorm Psychol; 2016 Jan; 125(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 26569036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Young Children Modulate Their Cognitive Control?
Ambrosi S; Lemaire P; Blaye A
Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 27221602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential dependencies in the Eriksen flanker task: a direct comparison of two competing accounts.
Davelaar EJ; Stevens J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19145021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. List-level control in the flanker task.
Bugg JM; Gonthier C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1444-1459. PubMed ID: 32103700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To adapt or not to adapt: the question of domain-general cognitive control.
Kan IP; Teubner-Rhodes S; Drummey AB; Nutile L; Krupa L; Novick JM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):637-51. PubMed ID: 24103774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task.
Soutschek A; Müller HJ; Schubert T
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 23128585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms.
Purmann S; Badde S; Wendt M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 19293106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conflict processing in kindergarten children: New evidence from distribution analyses reveals the dynamics of incorrect response activation and suppression.
Ambrosi S; Servant M; Blaye A; Burle B
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jan; 177():36-52. PubMed ID: 30165290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.
Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; McKay CC; Woldorff MG
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():14-28. PubMed ID: 26827917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal and spectral profiles of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict processing.
Wang K; Li Q; Zheng Y; Wang H; Liu X
Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 89():280-8. PubMed ID: 24315839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.
Keye D; Wilhelm O; Oberauer K; van Ravenzwaaij D
Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):762-76. PubMed ID: 19034502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of the effect of bilingualism on aging and cognitive control.
Kousaie S; Phillips NA
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():23-35. PubMed ID: 27876508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions.
Akçay Ç; Hazeltine E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):505-11. PubMed ID: 21404129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
