These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24489114)

  • 1. The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Halligan DL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):1010-28. PubMed ID: 24489114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila.
    Charlesworth B; Campos JL
    Annu Rev Genet; 2014; 48():383-403. PubMed ID: 25251853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular evolution in nonrecombining regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B; Haddrill PR
    Genome Biol Evol; 2012; 4(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 22275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.
    Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2012 May; 191(1):233-46. PubMed ID: 22377629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.
    Comeron JM
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1004434. PubMed ID: 24968283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.
    Charlesworth B; Betancourt AJ; Kaiser VB; Gordo I
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():177-86. PubMed ID: 19734202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.
    Harris M; Kim BY; Garud N
    Genetics; 2024 Apr; 226(4):. PubMed ID: 38366786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Zeng K; Parker DJ; Charlesworth B; Haddrill PR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):811-23. PubMed ID: 23204387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chan AH; Jenkins PA; Song YS
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(12):e1003090. PubMed ID: 23284288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.
    Kulathinal RJ; Bennett SM; Fitzpatrick CL; Noor MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(29):10051-6. PubMed ID: 18621713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recombination, dominance and selection on amino acid polymorphism in the Drosophila genome: contrasting patterns on the X and fourth chromosomes.
    Sheldahl LA; Weinreich DM; Rand DM
    Genetics; 2003 Nov; 165(3):1195-208. PubMed ID: 14668375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.
    Castellano D; Coronado-Zamora M; Campos JL; Barbadilla A; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 26494843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in
    Campos JL; Zhao L; Charlesworth B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):E4762-E4771. PubMed ID: 28559322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rare recombination events generate sequence diversity among balancer chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Miller DE; Cook KR; Yeganeh Kazemi N; Smith CB; Cockrell AJ; Hawley RS; Bergman CM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):E1352-61. PubMed ID: 26903656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elevated levels of expression associated with regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.
    Haddrill PR; Waldron FM; Charlesworth B
    Biol Lett; 2008 Dec; 4(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 18782733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila.
    McGaugh SE; Heil CS; Manzano-Winkler B; Loewe L; Goldstein S; Himmel TL; Noor MA
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(11):e1001422. PubMed ID: 23152720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine-scale heterogeneity in crossover rate in the garnet-scalloped region of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.
    Singh ND; Stone EA; Aquadro CF; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2013 Jun; 194(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 23410829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.
    Haddrill PR; Halligan DL; Tomaras D; Charlesworth B
    Genome Biol; 2007; 8(2):R18. PubMed ID: 17284312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Andolfatto P; Przeworski M
    Genetics; 2001 Jun; 158(2):657-65. PubMed ID: 11404330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.