These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24489666)

  • 1. Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.
    Lundberg KB; Payne BK
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85680. PubMed ID: 24489666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?
    Friese M; Smith CT; Plischke T; Bluemke M; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44130. PubMed ID: 22952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.
    Galli G; Sirota M; Materassi M; Zaninotto F; Terry P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 28981799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assumed policy similarity and voter preference.
    Quist RM; Crano WD
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Apr; 143(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 12735515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election.
    Friese M; Bluemke M; Wänke M
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 17953144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Race, Gender, and the U.S. Presidency: A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Biases in the Electorate.
    Calvert GA; Evans G; Pathak A
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Australian voters' attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants.
    Colvin RM; Jotzo F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0248268. PubMed ID: 33760842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early EEG responses to pre-electoral survey items reflect political attitudes and predict voting behavior.
    Galli G; Angelucci D; Bode S; De Giorgi C; De Sio L; Paparo A; Di Lorenzo G; Betti V
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18692. PubMed ID: 34548511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The N400 effect captures nuances in implicit political preferences.
    Mahieux E; de-Wit L; Otten LJ; Devlin JT; Wicha NYY
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16730. PubMed ID: 39030391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adoption of Strategies to Mitigate Transmission of COVID-19 During a Statewide Primary Election - Delaware, September 2020.
    Leidman E; Hall NB; Kirby AE; Garcia-Williams AG; Aponte J; Yoder JS; Hong R; Albence A; Coronado F; Massetti GM
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2020 Oct; 69(43):1571-1575. PubMed ID: 33119560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.
    England P; Hout M; Vilbig K; Wells K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(25):e2221910120. PubMed ID: 37307489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using "Big Data" Versus Alternative Measures of Aggregate Data to Predict the U.S. 2016 Presidential Election.
    Ma-Kellams C; Bishop B; Zhang MF; Villagrana B
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Aug; 121(4):726-735. PubMed ID: 29298630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions.
    Dalege J; Borsboom D; van Harreveld F; Waldorp LJ; van der Maas HLJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4909. PubMed ID: 28687776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections.
    Epstein R; Robertson RE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(33):E4512-21. PubMed ID: 26243876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.