These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24490638)

  • 41. Simultaneous strain-volume analysis by three-dimensional echocardiography: validation in normal subjects with tagging cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Lilli A; Tessa C; Diciotti S; Croisille P; Clarysse P; Del Meglio J; Salvatori L; Vignali C; Casolo G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2017 Apr; 18(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 26702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Peper ES; Strijkers GJ; Gazzola K; Potters WV; Motaal AG; Luirink IK; Hutten BA; Wiegman A; van Ooij P; van den Born BH; Nederveen AJ; Coolen BF
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Dec; 20(1):86. PubMed ID: 30567566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reliability of single breath hold three-dimensional cine kat-ARC for the assessment of biventricular dimensions and function.
    Muscogiuri G; Gatti M; Dell'Aversana S; Pica S; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Gripari P; Annoni A; Formenti A; Mancini ME; Rabbat MG; Pepi M; Pontone G
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 124():108820. PubMed ID: 31951894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluating a novel free-breathing accelerated cardiac MRI cine sequence in patients with cardiomyopathy.
    Roifman I; Gutierrez J; Wang E; Biswas L; Sparkes J; Connelly KA; Wright GA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 61():260-266. PubMed ID: 31200025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantitative CMR population imaging on 20,000 subjects of the UK Biobank imaging study: LV/RV quantification pipeline and its evaluation.
    Attar R; Pereañez M; Gooya A; Albà X; Zhang L; de Vila MH; Lee AM; Aung N; Lukaschuk E; Sanghvi MM; Fung K; Paiva JM; Piechnik SK; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Frangi AF
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Aug; 56():26-42. PubMed ID: 31154149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Raman SV; Shah M; McCarthy B; Garcia A; Ferketich AK
    Am Heart J; 2006 Mar; 151(3):736-44. PubMed ID: 16504643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quantification of LV function and mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: multi-center variability and consensus contours.
    Suinesiaputra A; Bluemke DA; Cowan BR; Friedrich MG; Kramer CM; Kwong R; Plein S; Schulz-Menger J; Westenberg JJ; Young AA; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jul; 17(1):63. PubMed ID: 26215273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three-dimensional cardiac cine imaging using the kat ARC acceleration: Initial experience in clinical adult patients at 3T.
    Okuda S; Yamada Y; Tanimoto A; Fujita J; Sano M; Fukuda K; Kuribayashi S; Jinzaki M; Nozaki A; Lai P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 25936683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of fully automated myocardial segmentation techniques in native and contrast-enhanced T1-mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using fully convolutional neural networks.
    Farrag NA; Lochbihler A; White JA; Ukwatta E
    Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):215-226. PubMed ID: 33131085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cine MR imaging of myocardial contractile impairment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy attributable to Asp175Asn mutation in the alpha-tropomyosin gene.
    Sipola P; Lauerma K; Jääskeläinen P; Laakso M; Peuhkurinen K; Manninen H; Aronen HJ; Kuusisto J
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):815-24. PubMed ID: 16014439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.
    Schuster A; Kutty S; Padiyath A; Parish V; Gribben P; Danford DA; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Oct; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 21992220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular volumes to full volume magnetic resonance imaging in normal and diseased rats.
    Arias T; Chen J; Fayad ZA; Fuster V; Hajjar RJ; Chemaly ER
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Aug; 26(8):910-8. PubMed ID: 23706342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantification in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: agreement of software from three different vendors on assessment of left ventricular function, 2D flow and parametric mapping.
    Zange L; Muehlberg F; Blaszczyk E; Schwenke S; Traber J; Funk S; Schulz-Menger J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Feb; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 30786898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. CMR reference values for left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction using computer-aided analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.
    Chuang ML; Gona P; Hautvast GL; Salton CJ; Breeuwer M; O'Donnell CJ; Manning WJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(4):895-900. PubMed ID: 24123369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of cine CMR imaging at 0.55 T and 1.5 T.
    Bandettini WP; Shanbhag SM; Mancini C; McGuirt DR; Kellman P; Xue H; Henry JL; Lowery M; Thein SL; Chen MY; Campbell-Washburn AE
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 May; 22(1):37. PubMed ID: 32423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Restoration of optimal ellipsoid left ventricular geometry: lessons learnt from in silico surgical modelling.
    Adhyapak SM; Menon PG; Rao Parachuri V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Feb; 18(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24234732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Correspondence between gated SPECT and cardiac magnetic resonance quantified myocardial wall thickening.
    Nichols KJ; Van Tosh A; Wang Y; Faber TL; Palestro CJ; Reichek N
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Oct; 27(7):1095-104. PubMed ID: 21110103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Feedback-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle with MRI.
    Swingen CM; Seethamraju RT; Jerosch-Herold M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 May; 17(5):528-37. PubMed ID: 12720262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.