These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

880 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24490789)

  • 1. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.
    Logan GD; Van Zandt T; Verbruggen F; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):66-95. PubMed ID: 24490789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions.
    Matzke D; Dolan CV; Logan GD; Brown SD; Wagenmakers EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1047-73. PubMed ID: 23163766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2009 May; 33(5):647-61. PubMed ID: 18822313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques.
    Middlebrooks PG; Schall JD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 24306985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibiting responses to difficult choices.
    Matzke D; Curley S; Gong CQ; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):124-142. PubMed ID: 30596441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
    Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.
    Colonius H; Diederich A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 30272461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of inhibitory control.
    Schall JD; Palmeri TJ; Logan GD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 372(1718):. PubMed ID: 28242727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method.
    Logan GD; Cowan WB; Davis KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):276-91. PubMed ID: 6232345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.
    Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Matzke D; Love J; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):267-281. PubMed ID: 26822670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):835-54. PubMed ID: 19485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action.
    Logan GD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):833-57. PubMed ID: 25633089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working Memory Load Selectively Influences Response Inhibition in a Stop Signal Task.
    Boucher L; Viparina B; Collins WM
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Jun; 124(3):1268-1281. PubMed ID: 32515276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How preparation changes the need for top-down control of the basal ganglia when inhibiting premature actions.
    Jahfari S; Verbruggen F; Frank MJ; Waldorp LJ; Colzato L; Ridderinkhof KR; Forstmann BU
    J Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 32(32):10870-8. PubMed ID: 22875921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.
    Bari A; Robbins TW
    Prog Neurobiol; 2013 Sep; 108():44-79. PubMed ID: 23856628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential.
    Hsieh S; Lin YC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):348-363. PubMed ID: 27896714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparation to inhibit a response complements response inhibition during performance of a stop-signal task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Hirose S; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 29(50):15870-7. PubMed ID: 20016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.
    Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.