These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24490796)

  • 1. Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.
    Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):6. PubMed ID: 24490796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
    Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
    Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
    Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; O'Connell JR; Bacheller LR
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1874-9. PubMed ID: 23332849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; van der Werf JH; Cleveland MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jun; 44(1):9. PubMed ID: 22462519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 21624176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.
    Pausch H; Aigner B; Emmerling R; Edel C; Götz KU; Fries R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Feb; 45(1):3. PubMed ID: 23406470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture.
    Pimentel EC; Wensch-Dorendorf M; König S; Swalve HH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):12. PubMed ID: 23621897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
    See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
    Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imputation of missing genotypes from low- to high-density SNP panel in different population designs.
    He S; Wang S; Fu W; Ding X; Zhang Q
    Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25431355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recombination locations and rates in beef cattle assessed from parent-offspring pairs.
    Weng ZQ; Saatchi M; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):34. PubMed ID: 24885305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.
    Judge MM; Purfield DC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28464096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.