145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24491283)
1. Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.
Chiu KW; Ling L; Tripathi V; Ahmed M; Shrivastava V
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24491283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superior Reproducibility of the Leading to Leading Edge and Inner to Inner Edge Methods in the Ultrasound Assessment of Maximum Abdominal Aortic Diameter.
Borgbjerg J; Bøgsted M; Lindholt JS; Behr-Rasmussen C; Hørlyck A; Frøkjær JB
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 55(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 29277483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme.
Hartshorne TC; McCollum CN; Earnshaw JJ; Morris J; Nasim A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 42(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 21439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: A Study on the Discrepancy between Inner to Inner and Outer to Outer Measurements.
Meecham L; Evans R; Buxton P; Allingham K; Hughes M; Rajagopalan S; Fairhead J; Asquith JR; Pherwani AD
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 49(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 25453235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.
Gürtelschmid M; Björck M; Wanhainen A
Br J Surg; 2014 May; 101(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 24723017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of ultrasound in a screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Thomas PR; Shaw JC; Ashton HA; Kay DN; Scott RA
J Med Screen; 1994 Jan; 1(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8790479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between computed tomography and ultrasound on abdominal aortic aneurysms and implications on clinical decisions.
Foo FJ; Hammond CJ; Goldstone AR; Abuhamdiah M; Rashid ST; West RM; Nicholson AA; Scott DJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 42(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 21852165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Bredahl K; Sandholt B; Lönn L; Rouet L; Ardon R; Eiberg JP; Sillesen H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 25662155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images.
Matthews EO; Pinchbeck J; Elmore K; Jones RE; Moxon JV; Golledge J
Ultrasound J; 2021 Feb; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 33646456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wever JJ; Blankensteijn JD; van Rijn JC; Broeders IA; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1279-82. PubMed ID: 11044022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize.
Cayne NS; Veith FJ; Lipsitz EC; Ohki T; Mehta M; Gargiulo N; Suggs WD; Rozenblit A; Ricci Z; Timaran CH
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Apr; 39(4):811-5. PubMed ID: 15071447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Agreement between Nurses in the Ultrasound Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Diameter within a National Screening Programme.
Crilly MA; Mundie A; Bachoo P; Bruce P; Colvin FA; Geddes WA; Smart HE
Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 May; 33():194-201. PubMed ID: 26902935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of aorta scan BVI 9600 in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Nguyen AT; Hill GB; Thomson IA; van Rij AM
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 48(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 24882423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of serial screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms by ultrasound.
Wilmink AB; Forshaw M; Quick CR; Hubbard CS; Day NE
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(3):125-7. PubMed ID: 12370324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of the measurement of the abdominal aortic diameter by novice operators using a pocket-sized ultrasound system.
Bonnafy T; Lacroix P; Desormais I; Labrunie A; Marin B; Leclerc A; Oueslati A; Rollé F; Vignon P; Aboyans V
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013 Dec; 106(12):644-50. PubMed ID: 24246614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.
Lederle FA; Wilson SE; Johnson GR; Reinke DB; Littooy FN; Acher CW; Messina LM; Ballard DJ; Ansel HJ
J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 21(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 7776474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editor's Choice - Comparison of the Reproducibility of Ultrasound Calliper Placement Methods in Abdominal Aortic Diameter Measurements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.
Bissacco D; Mandigers TJ; Savaré L; Domanin M; D'Oria M; Ieva F; Van Herwaarden JA; Mani K; Wanhainen A; Trimarchi S
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2023 Nov; 66(5):620-631. PubMed ID: 37331424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infra-renal abdominal aortic calcification volume does not predict small abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.
Hendy K; Gunnarsson R; Cronin O; Golledge J
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):334-8. PubMed ID: 26433350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional ultrasonography measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Causey MW; Jayaraj A; Leotta DF; Paun M; Beach KW; Kohler TR; Zierler ER; Starnes BW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22749436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta.
Beales L; Wolstenhulme S; Evans JA; West R; Scott DJ
Br J Surg; 2011 Nov; 98(11):1517-25. PubMed ID: 21861264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
