BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24491410)

  • 1. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
    Kuhn FP; Hüllner M; Mader CE; Kastrinidis N; Huber GF; von Schulthess GK; Kollias S; Veit-Haibach P
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 24491410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
    Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whole-body nonenhanced PET/MR versus PET/CT in the staging and restaging of cancers: preliminary observations.
    Huellner MW; Appenzeller P; Kuhn FP; Husmann L; Pietsch CM; Burger IA; Porto M; Delso G; von Schulthess GK; Veit-Haibach P
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):859-69. PubMed ID: 25102372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of a MR-PET protocol for staging of head-and-neck cancer including Dixon MR for attenuation correction.
    Eiber M; Souvatzoglou M; Pickhard A; Loeffelbein DJ; Knopf A; Holzapfel K; Martinez-Möller A; Nekolla SG; Scherer EQ; Schwaiger M; Rummeny EJ; Beer AJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2658-65. PubMed ID: 22078793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to
    Zheng D; Liu Y; Liu J; Li K; Lin M; Schmidt H; Xu B; Tian J
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 32546207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging--pilot study.
    Schwenzer NF; Schraml C; Müller M; Brendle C; Sauter A; Spengler W; Pfannenberg AC; Claussen CD; Schmidt H
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 22653189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.
    Quick HH; von Gall C; Zeilinger M; Wiesmüller M; Braun H; Ziegler S; Kuwert T; Uder M; Dörfler A; Kalender WA; Lell M
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 23442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.
    Kitagawa Y; Nishizawa S; Sano K; Ogasawara T; Nakamura M; Sadato N; Yoshida M; Yonekura Y
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 12571209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study.
    Roh JL; Park JP; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 24475791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI: A comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients.
    Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Wetter A; Kirchner J; Kinner S; Aktas B; Forsting M; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():14-19. PubMed ID: 28267530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Qualitative and quantitative performance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Partovi S; Kohan A; Vercher-Conejero JL; Rubbert C; Margevicius S; Schluchter MD; Gaeta C; Faulhaber P; Robbin MR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1970-5. PubMed ID: 24924545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of retrospective image fusion of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI.
    Kanda T; Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Konishi J; Sasaki R; Morimoto K; Saito M; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2005-10. PubMed ID: 23891295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [18F]FDG imaging of head and neck tumours: comparison of hybrid PET and morphological methods.
    Dresel S; Grammerstorff J; Schwenzer K; Brinkbäumer K; Schmid R; Pfluger T; Hahn K
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jul; 30(7):995-1003. PubMed ID: 12739070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDG PET/MR for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer.
    Platzek I; Beuthien-Baumann B; Schneider M; Gudziol V; Kitzler HH; Maus J; Schramm G; Popp M; Laniado M; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 24746792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PET/MRI and PET/CT in follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.
    Queiroz MA; Hüllner M; Kuhn F; Huber G; Meerwein C; Kollias S; von Schulthess G; Veit-Haibach P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Jun; 41(6):1066-75. PubMed ID: 24577950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PET+MR versus PET/CT in the initial staging of head and neck cancer, using a trimodality PET/CT+MR system.
    Sekine T; de Galiza Barbosa F; Kuhn FP; Burger IA; Stolzmann P; Huber GF; Kollias SS; von Schulthess GK; Veit-Haibach P; Huellner MW
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():232-239. PubMed ID: 28129606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas- and CT-Based Attenuation Correction.
    Sekine T; Burgos N; Warnock G; Huellner M; Buck A; Ter Voert EE; Cardoso MJ; Hutton BF; Ourselin S; Veit-Haibach P; Delso G
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1258-64. PubMed ID: 27013697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PET/MR imaging in the detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions: technical and diagnostic evaluation in comparison to PET/CT.
    Rauscher I; Eiber M; Fürst S; Souvatzoglou M; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI; Rummeny EJ; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 May; 55(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 24652827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staging pathways in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: is contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT the diagnostic tool of choice?
    Soyka JD; Veit-Haibach P; Strobel K; Breitenstein S; Tschopp A; Mende KA; Lago MP; Hany TF
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Mar; 49(3):354-61. PubMed ID: 18287263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
    Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 80.