These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24492502)

  • 1. Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter.
    Mazumdar D; Pel JJ; Panday M; Asokan R; Vijaya L; Shantha B; George R; Van Der Steen J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 62(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24492502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry.
    Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George R
    J Glaucoma; 2020 May; 29(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 32108671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccadic reaction time in mirror image sectors across horizontal meridian in eye movement perimetry.
    Mazumdar D; Meethal NSK; George R; Pel JJM
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2630. PubMed ID: 33514780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening.
    Meethal NSK; Pel JJM; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; George R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1277-1287. PubMed ID: 30944987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slowed Saccadic Reaction Times in Seemingly Normal Parts of Glaucomatous Visual Fields.
    Thepass G; Lemij HG; Vermeer KA; van der Steen J; Pel JJM
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():679297. PubMed ID: 34513866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
    Kogure S; Toda Y; Crabb D; Kashiwagi K; Fitzke FW; Tsukahara S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 87(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 12714404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry.
    Roberti G; Manni G; Riva I; Holló G; Quaranta L; Agnifili L; Figus M; Giammaria S; Rastelli D; Oddone F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186793. PubMed ID: 29077730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements during visual search in patients with glaucoma.
    Smith ND; Glen FC; Crabb DP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22937814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Age, Sex, Stimulus Intensity, and Eccentricity on Saccadic Reaction Time in Eye Movement Perimetry.
    Mazumdar D; Meethal NSK; Panday M; Asokan R; Thepass G; George RJ; van der Steen J; Pel JJM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 8(4):13. PubMed ID: 31388465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speed and accuracy of saccades in patients with glaucoma evaluated using an eye tracking perimeter.
    Tatham AJ; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):259. PubMed ID: 32605609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.
    Paré M; Munoz DP
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3666-81. PubMed ID: 8985865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
    Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.
    Kumagai T; Shoji T; Yoshikawa Y; Mine I; Kanno J; Ishii H; Saito A; Ishikawa S; Kimura I; Shinoda K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 104(11):1258-1534. PubMed ID: 32152139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.